I'd rather have this type of restraint than a horsecollar. Love that review, "8 corkscrews." Whew! It looks like he/she was referring to the lift structure thingy. *** Edited 3/19/2008 7:43:59 PM UTC by CoasterComet***
This coaster could be really cool... or really lame, as long as it seems to fit it'll make sense, if not then it'll be a worse eye sore than the wand on Spaceship Earth...
We have a week's vacation in late February every year. So far, that week has always been Disney centric. My wife has told me, in no uncertain terms, that when it comes time to look for lodging for our 2010 trip, I will be looking near Universal, and not near Disney.
Note that that proclamation was made with effectively no details about what would be in the new land.
That being said, friends who've ridden Magic Springs' X-Car coaster say it's quite comfy...and at $4M, the price was right (not that Universal is on any kind of budget, LOL).
You still have Zoidberg.... You ALL have Zoidberg! (V) (;,,;) (V)
If they do as good a job on this new coaster and Potter Land as they did on Mummy, count me in. *** Edited 3/19/2008 8:58:15 PM UTC by Downhill Screamer***
http://www.maurer-soehne.com/files/amusement/pdf/Multimedia_X-Seat_en.pdf
And for those who still don't believe it is an x-car:
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
Gator: ...friends who've ridden Magic Springs' X-Car coaster say it's quite comfy...
As one of the friends in mention I add that the big problem with Magic Spring's X Coaster wasn't the trains or restraints (both get thumbs up from me) but the huge amount of downtime. With minimal crowds I was lucky to get two rides because the ride was constantly being e-stopped.
You won't see me coming...
Rob Ascough said:
That's what I'm thinking. Unless the Harry Potter area is going to have one or two kick-ass rides/attractions, it's basically a really expensive coat of paint. Whether or not people are fooled remains to be seen.
Unless I missed something I think its going to be a new land. There is a lot of constuction going on behind Jurassic park, and when I peeked behind the fence I saw a huge plot of land being bulldozed.
I still hear that the Jurassic Park construction area will be for a new JP attraction.
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
Absimilliard said:
I wonder how they'll make the ride ADA accessible with that vertical lift? Orlando has many visitors travelling in wheelchairs, using ECV, etc. and I can't imagine them trying to quickly evacuate the vertical lift if it E-stops often...
Well, techically no lift hills are ADA accessible. Only the station would be required to be. In order to be ADA compliant, it would need an elevator. And for that matter, no lift hills are even built to stair code. If so, it would need a 5'-0" landing for every 12 feet of rise. I think it would be safe to guess that coaster lift hills are excempt from code or ADA compliance.
delan said:
Rob Ascough said:
That's what I'm thinking. Unless the Harry Potter area is going to have one or two kick-ass rides/attractions, it's basically a really expensive coat of paint. Whether or not people are fooled remains to be seen.Unless I missed something I think its going to be a new land. There is a lot of constuction going on behind Jurassic park, and when I peeked behind the fence I saw a huge plot of land being bulldozed.
It'll be both, some new, some old. Though I do still stand by my feelings that Potter will somewhat disappoint some people because Universal advertising is horrible (like everyone thinking Islands of Adventure was just a new land, opposed to a whole new park). I've already talked to a few potterheads (so many ways to read into that... oy) that thought Universal was building a whole park for Harry, and when learning about it only being a land, seemed interested, but significanly disappointed.
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
You must be logged in to post