I disagree that a longer duration is needed to "make" the ride. One of the main elements of the rocket is the launch. I realize that LIM launches were out long ago, but it just isn't the same. I'd assume that it's because rockets have a faster acceleration, plus you hear more of a smooth "zing" sound of the cable instead of the "whomph" of the magnets.
With that said, I'm in favor of a couple elements (Stormrunner style, or even Kannonen.. except I haven't ridden the latter and probably won't be able to for quite a bit) other than just L-TH-B, even if you throw in a bunny hill :)
I'm a huge fan of TTD, so I have to say I don't see people lining up for the launch rides that last longer like they do on TTD. Drag racing is one of the biggest rushes you can get and it only lasts a few seconds, that's how TTD is.
Actually, Storm Runner is a good example of people lining up for rocket coasters that do something more than TTD. *** Edited 12/30/2004 2:27:00 PM UTC by Coasterbuzzer***
Intamin doesn't come up with the layouts, the park's ordered those layouts because that's what they wanted. Intamin would design a rocket with 800 overbanks and loops if a park was willing to pay for it.
So you're saying that because there will soon be all of 2, *maybe* three L-TH-B rockets that they're boring and out of style? Guess that's why when there got to be 2 boomerangs, or 2 SLCs, or 2 Arrow loop-screws they went completely out of style! I mean geez, who would want a coaster that has a high "wow" factor, a high capacity, a small footprint for the thrills provided and is instantly marketable? That's just a disaster because, come on, there's two others in the world! They're just *so* last year! Like, my GOD, like REALLY and stuff *snap* *twirl hair*
What are you talking about $25 million rides vs. $9 million? You said that the rocket coaster will go "out of style" (as if there is such a thing) if Intamin doesn't make more than L-TH-B. Well, there's only 1 1/2 of those types out there, so what you're saying is absolutely ridiculous because if coasters went "out of style" by the second one, explain the sheer number of boomerangs, loopscrews, SLCs, heck even Cyclone clones out there.
Nothing's going to go "out of style" because 50% of more of the people in line for either TTD or KK won't even know of the other's existance, or care. No one cares that much that there are two coasters of the "same style" so close together at GL and CP, both still get riders (well that's a relative term in GL's case, but still ... ). You cannot seriously believe that after 1 1/2 installations, parks across the globe are dismissing the rocket as "been there done that" and not drooling over the possibilities for their own park?
Intamin will make them, companies will buy. There will, by 2006 be 2 L-th-bh-br, and one L-TH-B. That isn't going to push it out of style.
Jeesh!(hadn't done it in a long time:))
Here is what Gomez said. And I quote.
"I'm a huge fan of TTD, so I have to say I don't see people lining up for the launch rides that last longer like they do on TTD"
I said that I disagreed and pointed out Storm Runner as an example of a rocket coaster that does more. You're putting words in my mouth. Read posts instead of skimming through them and you might see what I am talking about.
Impulse-ive Said:
Intamin doesn't come up with the layouts, the park's ordered those layouts because that's what they wanted. Intamin would design a rocket with 800 overbanks and loops if a park was willing to pay for it.
I just wanted to point this out for all the nay-sayers who ripped into me for my comments re: B&M Flyer designs/elements being requested by the park in which the coaster is going. ;)
You must be logged in to post