My apologies if this isn't coaster related enough.
I am staying at the Holiday Inn Tampa Busch Gardens, which according to Priceline, who I booked through, is a 3-star hotel. Last night, on the trip down, we stayed at a 2-1/2 star hotel (also a Holiday Inn), which was much nicer, and seemed to have more amenities. The part of the hotel they put me in doesn't even have elevators! (And I know part of Breakers at CP doesn't, but that is historic. This isn't.)
Based on all your experiences, is it normal for a hotel near a park to be worse than average for the chain/hotel type? It seems like the proximity to the park (5 minutes) is allowing the hotel to take advantage of the tourists, and pass off a mediocre hotel as an upscale hotel.
-Sam
Why is a 2-1/2 star in Knoxville, TN much better than a 3 star in Tampa? It is nice to be near the park, but proximity to a park should not be a reason to give the hotel more stars than it deserves! That is what really ticks me off. Technically, this hotel meets Priceline's criteria for three stars, but in reality, this place is a dump. I've stayed in what would be considered one star hotels that are nicer than this!
Anyway, am I alone, or are there others that have fallen into this trap when visiting a park?
-Sam (who is typing this outside, because their so-called high speed internet isn't even available in the building where they put us!)
Obviously, YMMV. :(
The Flying Turns makes all the right people wet - Gonch
Priceline can be inconsistent in their ratings, for a variety of reasons. First, there are just a lot of properties to rate, and it's hard to be terribly accurate. Second, if a hotel is partially renovated, guess which customers get put in the older rooms? Guess which rooms the *rating* is based on? Third, hotels will ask to be "downrated" if they are the only hotel in a particular rating/geographic area, because otherwise the bidding is no longer opaque. (In other words, if there is only one four star in, say, Birmingham, and you bid on a four star there, you know exactly what hotel you are getting in advance.)
Read priceline's descirptions of what consitutes a 3-star hotel; if any of the listed amenities were not there, send them a comment via feedback suggesting that the property be downrated.
That said, this is not a problem unique to priceline. For example, I've been in properties that cover a vast quality range, all of which are rated three AAA diamonds, and some that are "worse" than other two-diamond properties.
As far as hotels, I have heard that a lot of times, the nicer hotels will not honor your special requests and such (i.e. high floor, city view, nonsmoking room) if you booked through Priceline. Again, I'd rather pay extra and get what I want.
And as far as hotels near parks, I've only stayed at one, the Country Inn and Suites across the street from SFGAm, and it was quite nice.
That being said, there are a LOT of real dives around BGT....I learned the hard way myself...*shudder*.
That could be a whole 'nother topic.
As far as hotels, I have heard that a lot of times, the nicer hotels will not honor your special requests and such (i.e. high floor, city view, nonsmoking room) if you booked through Priceline. Again, I'd rather pay extra and get what I want.
We've used about Priceline around 20 times over the past few years. While it's true that some hotels are not as accomadating to Priceline travlers, most treat you just like any other guest. We've had very few problems with special requests.
I've gotten some very nice hotels through Priceline at rates that wouldn't normally get you a Motel 6. Even those that were average were well worth the price.
It definately pays to do some research first. I'd strongly suggest the biddingfortravel site linked above.
Kyle
Based on all your experiences, is it normal for a hotel near a park to be worse than average for the chain/hotel type?
Not necessarily normal, but I've found that any 'touristy' hotel usually doesn't compare in quality to an equivalent one near say a convertion center or downtown.
It seems like the proximity to the park (5 minutes) is allowing the hotel to take advantage of the tourists, and pass off a mediocre hotel as an upscale hotel.
Like others have said, the hotels don't rate themselves. I'm not sure if Priceline using the industry standard AAA ratings or creates their own, but the hotels can't be blamed for the rating priceline gives. This leads to:
Technically, this hotel meets Priceline's criteria for three stars, but in reality, this place is a dump.
So we've learned that amentities don't = quality. ;)
Seriously, I just went by priceline and read their hotel ratings guide. It really doesn't say anything about the quality of the place you'll be staying (except for the generic description of "high quality"), just what amentities it offers.
Also, hotels who put themselves in the priceline rotation do so for a reason. Think about it. Why would a hotel agree to give their rooms away for next to nothing? They're not selling on their own at the 'standard' rates they set. That could be happeneing for a variety of reasons, but you have to wonder why.
I know the public excuse is "unsold inventory" and many companies do use the 'heads in beds' approach. It's one I disagree with (as does my wife who is a GM at a hotel and the company she works for) - when you stop and do the math you're not making any extra money giving away $30 or $40 rooms on priceline. You now need additional labor to clean the room, you will likely go through more breakfast invetory, additional utilities will be used, you spend more in laundry to wash the beddings, etc.
All the heads in beds approach does is artificially inflate occupancy numbers to please corporate.
Second, if a hotel is partially renovated, guess which customers get put in the older rooms?
This is absolutely true and again, really obvious if you think about it. Those hotels don't give a crap about you. You're just a head to fill their occupancy goals. There are plenty of people in the hotel who paid a full rate that could be as much as 3 or 4 or 5 times what you paid. You're essentially going to get the leftovers - unrenovated rooms, smaller rooms, rooms in noisier locations (by elevators, pools, or lobbies) - things like that. Of course, if the hotel is exceptionally dead (and it very well may be if they're resorting to Pricline), then maybe only 10 of the 100 rooms are sold and the worst available rooms are still very nice.
In the end it depends on a combo or your expectations and dumb luck. That's why we're seeing the varied responses in this thread. Some people expect more in a hotel than others and depending on the day you're staying, the hotel that has availability, and what choice you make on priceline - you fill in different variables to the equation and get this plethora of responses.
FWIW, this hotel snob (and semi-control freak) wouldn't touch priceline with your money.
*** Edited 4/21/2005 4:31:23 PM UTC by Lord Gonchar***
Only use priceline is you do not care what kind of dump you are put up in though.
Guess who's back? Back Again? James K's back. Tell a friend.
I've found that any 'touristy' hotel usually doesn't compare in quality to an equivalent one near say a convertion center or downtown
That's true of whole areas as well: areas that cater strictly to tourists (Branson, Pigeon Forge, Sandusky) have lousy hotel stock generally. Areas that also have a business draw or do significant convention business tend to have nicer places, even within the chain.
That's exactly why we do things like drive right by PKD from the north and stay in Richmond, or stay in Waterbury for the LC/SFNE combo, or stay in Buffalo for the SFNE/Seabreeze/Falls combo.
It's also why I lean towards Marriott as they tend to be more business customer oriented in their approach. Of course, that hurts when going somewhere like the Dells (no Mariott hotels) or Virginia Beach (only 3 hotels on the beach) or Canada's side of the falls (again, just three hotels) or similar cheeseball tourist traps.
I'm willing to drive a little to the park in the morning to avoid the 'touristy' hotels.
/hotel snob
You must be logged in to post