Generally, no one in their right mind believes in it. The developer works in a sandwich shop.
Just as a little "nail in the coffin" information - I work in a department now where I work with master plans for the Pittsburgh airport area ... there's no land west of the airport that's being used for an amusement park. Warehouses? Yea. New interchanges? Yea. Office space? Yea. Large building which will be right in the runway protection zones and probably very reflective? When pigs fly.
Edit: they're going to have to use capital letters when they apply to the FAA for clearance to build an amusement park on land that's probably owned by the airport, so based on the website, that might end up being a major problem.
*** Edited 7/21/2005 11:29:25 AM UTC by Impulse-ive***
I am confused though, is the fishing lake and campground enclosed as well? ;-)
If the dude needs land there are PLENTY of naked mountains around here nowadays. Charleston needs something like that more than Pittsburgh anyway. ;-)
-Tina
Either this guy dreams big, (and there's nothing wrong with that!). Or he's yanking our legs. He would need a place as big as MOA to fit everything he wants in it. But, I must admit, it would be a dream come true.
-Tina
*** Edited 7/22/2005 6:02:00 PM UTC by coasterqueenTRN***
-Tina
-Tina"
Yes, I completely agree. West Virginia needs a new park before Pennsylvania.
Kudos to that guys imagination, and to this Pittsburgh guys as well. But it seems there is no basis in reality. Just like the slightly mentally challenged man I know who decided to run for president :)
Edit (wasn't done, trigger happy on the submit button .. ): I love it when this thing pops back up from the dead. I give it 4 months before someone brings it up again and we have the same discussion, AGAIN. *** Edited 7/23/2005 6:03:23 PM UTC by Impulse-ive***
You must be logged in to post