Park Review v. Trip Report

I *hate* to even 'sort of' open a closed topic, but I was in the midst of a question when the other topic was closed and I'm so arrogant that I think my question deserves tending. So here goes.

Well as long as we are on the subject, what are you looking for in a Park Review. Every one here knows (and dreads) that I write insanely long Trip Reports, but what type of "tweaking" would need to be done to convert an average TR into a PR. I'm not *wholely* interested in writing one, but it would be a nice thought to keep in the back of my head.
TIA
jeremy
-------------
"To get inside this head of mine, would take a monkey-wrench, and a lot of wine" Res How I Do

"Please post your less detailed, everyday trip reports to our forums."

That's the difference. A TR is representative of your day while a review would be something you'd tell another about any day that they might visit. For example, I could say, "Magnum was running great" in a TR, but in a review, I would say, "Magnum is a standard out-and-back design and a favorite to many as the world's first hyper."

-----------------
Jeff - Webmaster/Admin - CoasterBuzz.com, Sillynonsense.com
"We used to hate people, now we just make fun of them. It's more effective that way." - KMFDM, "Dogma"