I disagree with the whole concept to begin with, but especially when it comes to robbing the amusement parks of the hours they are open when it is night outside. Indiana Beach was a big voice against changing to DST. I wonder if they will push their hours back one hour to compensate for the change.
Frontrider said it far better than I ever could have, thank you.
*** Edited 7/23/2005 9:59:40 PM UTC by CPgenius***
And yes DST is needed. Could you imagine staying out late on a Friday night til about 3-4AM and the sun is already on its way out? 5AM out here is just as bright as 9 o'clock! I like the sun, but I dont need God's flashlight out that early.
And my time living in Indiana was the most screwed up. It was SO BRIGHT during the summer mornings, all the television shows came on at funny times and I just never really got adjusted to it. I dont get why you people tolerate, let alone enjoy the upheaval that happens every six months. To me, that's just weird for no good reason!
lata, jeremy
zacharyt.shutterfly.com
PlaceHolder for Castor & Pollux
What I can't imagine is the sun just going down at 10:00 pm next year because our state adopts this new time zone.
The only way to change that is to change the declination of the earth's axis, which I'm sure many in Congress think they should have the power to do simply by passing a law.
I keep hearing about how extended DST is supposed to save energy-- but nobody's ever given any specifics of how and where. What particular energy consuming activities are going to be changed?
Here's an example-- here in PA in early to mid March, sunrise is around 6:40, and sunset is 6:10 or 6:15 (all times EST). So when I leave for work around 7, the sun has just risen but when I get home around 6:30, it has already set. So if we extend DST into March, sunset won't be until around 7:15, almost an hour after I get home. BUT, sunrise won't be until 7:40 when I'm nearly at work. So, how much energy is saved by my turning the lights on to eat breakfast as opposed to turning them on to eat supper? Other than feeling "sunnier" along with Rep. Markey, what has changed?
These shmucks are totally out of touch with reality if they thing that this nation's energy consumption is based mainly on the amount of hours one must turn on a few light bulbs in one's house. But then again, anyone who thinks kids will rejoice at the possibility of more daytime trick-or-treating. Hell, just send them out at noon, and I'll leave a bowl of Hershey miniatures on the porch when I leave for work that morning.
Sorry, Jeremy, but 3-4 AM is not Friday night, it's already Saturday morning. :)
You must be logged in to post