Overall, I must say I am very disappointed with this show as well as this year's lineup. What did you all think of this show?
green won
*** This post was edited by petie 5/26/2003 10:56:41 PM ***
BTW, it was the cute co-eds that won, largely because they eat free food like college kids. ;-)
------------------
The Toledo Blah, One of America's Great Birdcage Liners
I am a college kid
------------------
Shop @ www.countypaintball.com "Paintball should be fun, not expensive"
------------------
Jim Hansen
Number of coasters ridden: 244
------------------
Purple cows eat silver moon pies, among fiesty, glowing fireflies.
I loved watching the people almost puke sushi.
*** This post was edited by thepinkdoomofmonkeys 5/26/2003 11:15:44 PM ***
However, even if the show tried its darndest to be politically correct, it could have had so much more potential. The editing was terrible. Here were some major flaws in the production:
-- I couldn't believe that in the opening trampoline event the narrator was actually revealing what place folks finished before they even started. Dumb.
-- I think I saw the host listed in the credits as a producer so that might explain how he got the gig, but there was too much of him and not enough of the contestants. A little less ego and a little more "Amazing Race" in terms of fleshing out the personalities of the teams would have made this far more enjoyable.
-- Again, the concept rocked, but it was executed poorly. The games weren't all that reality-show friendly save for possibly the Dive Devil and Rotor obstacle course.
-- The point scoring system? It helps if you explain it a little better. Except for the clear cut Dive Devil point system it all seemed random at times.
Hopefully the second installment will learn from this one. I think it was still a lot better than the bad rap most of you are giving it. I realize that some of you got passed over for the show. I realize that you didn't get five CoasterBuzz teams and a portfolio of cool park stunts. But I knew exactly what I would be getting and I was fine with what I got. If this show gets spliced together for a rerun I think there is a lot lying on the cutting room floor that could take out more of the host and put in more of the personalities that were duking it out. That's just what good television is about.
------------------
Am I really that shy?
actually the host is an speaker...and a hypnotist (sp?) he is a really great person...
All together this years TCS (thrills,chills& spills) lineup wasn't all that great(mostly reruns) but I did enjoy watching making of a coaster though.
I think this year's poor lineup was the result of fewer new rides/coasters being built in the US since last year's Extreme rides show was taped,which is why there was no extreme rides 2003 this year,however discovery doesn't have to film the shows at SF parks when they can always film at any of the paramount or CF parks withthe exception b ein CP or KBF.
Let's hope for a better lineup of shows for 04's thrills.chills & spills,we just might get better results by then.
The problem with the older shows (other than I"ve seen them a gaxzillion times) is that the info is dated. The amusement industry moves about as fast as any and a show that's even one year old can be outdated. It just annoys people who take it seriously and misinforms those who don't.
The Shy One said:They all suck and make me sick with the lies (the only one I saw today said X-Flight was the only flyer to have double barrel-rolls * cough* Batwing).
See what I mean about the effects outdated info has on enthusiasts? ;)
EDIT - As one who is highly skilled in the fine art of profanity, I forgot to give props to Petie and Crystal for the string of profanities on X. Beautiful! :)
------------------
www.coasterimage.com
Dorney Park Visits in 2003: 4
*** This post was edited by Lord Gonchar 5/27/2003 1:31:41 PM ***
You must be logged in to post