Like I said (and Ray obviously supports), I don't think it's as important for Cedar Fair parks to be known as Cedar Fair parks as it is important for Target stores to be known as Target stores.
http://disneyparks.disney.go.com/
No... only Cedar Fair would think of that.
millrace said:
I find it interesting that nearly all Cedar Fair parks have that same logo font with the flags over the i except for Valleyfair.
No Valleyfair has it too. http://www.midwestinfoguide.com/gallery/parks/vf/1.html
Jeff said:Do we really need another stupid acronym? Isn't "CF" or "Cedar Fair" adequate?
Honestly if it bothers you that much you can edit it.
Thats not fair. Your comparing a Six Flags park to Dieland. Of course they would choose Dieland.
Coasterkid-125 said:
Brands do help a park. If someone moves to a new town with 2 amusment parks. SIxFlags and Dieland, which is the person going to pick. If I had to guess i would pick Sixflags because every one knows sixflags and no one knows about dieland.
before, CF only had a handful of parks. In the span of 2 years, they DOUBLED the size of the company in terms of parks.
Six Flags had a ton, and had the brand name
Cedar Fair had 6, and had a lot of park individuality.
Now that they're roughly the same size, it makes sense to brand things a little bit, especially when you're talking about marketing mailers. If you're a group planner, and you get stuff from a couple parks, you'll notice the similar logos and realize they're owned by the same people. It helps to promote confidence, even if subconsciously.
. *** Edited 3/7/2007 10:55:23 PM UTC by Coasterkid200***
Timbers crew 08
Timbers crew 08
You must be logged in to post