Webmaster/Podcast host for Coasterfanbase.com
Coasterfanbase.com
SONiC Senshi said:
By the way did anyone notice that at 380 feet, it would be the fifth tallest coaster not the thrid? ^_^
Obviously NASA considers Superman The escape to be a roller coaster because their's is not full circuit either and they call it a coaster. NASA probably is basing that record of height on the max height the train travels not the height of the structure.
I think it would have made more sense if the drop went underground b/c that way the train would leave the danger zone faster. Heck the track could go straight down until the tunnel came. The radius of the pullout wouldn't have to be that great b/c only trained astrounats who already have space suits on will descend it. If you look at the radius of the arc now it's obvious that the g-forces will greatly exceed anything an amusement park has to offer.
-Eric: Major Parks: SFNE(homepark), SFA,SFGADV,CP,BGE,BGA,Kennywood,and Sea World: Track record 65 different coasters ridden #1 is Millennium Force #2 is El Toro and than there are all the others
Coaster Junkie from NH
I drive in & out of Boston, so I ride coasters to relax!
Some people don't know the roller coaster you have in this thread here on the NASA roller coaster for Ares I at KSC, has been changed.
Basically, NASASpaceflight.com published an exclusive on the first version a year ago here: http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=4888 and some other media like Popsi and USA Today used that NSF story.
Then, just the other week, nasa.gov released that news and other media published it as new news. But it's not
It's changed again after the 5G pullout was scrapped.
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5248
"The Rollercoaster Emergency Escape System (EES) will now be a fixed, permanent structure at launch pad 39B, after undergoing a redesign to reduce the G-Forces on personnel escaping the pad.
"A brainstorming meeting between NASA, the contractor RS&H, and Disney concluded with a new design to the coaster, approved ahead of the start of construction next year.
"The previous concept, exclusively revealed by NASASpaceFlight.com over a year ago, has only just recently started to gain media attention from some of the other space news sites after NASA.gov released an image and a short write up last week. However, that design, which was produced on September, 2006, has now been scrapped. "
Rest of the story on that link.
You must be logged in to post