But here's my take on the new name...I think it's a good move. Sure, everyone else will bombard with replies like - "THAT NAME IS SO LAME!" or "WOW, THAT'S NOT ORIGINAL [/SARCASM], I think the new name is more marketable and catches on easier.
Ride The Roller Coaster at the New York New York
as opposed to
Ride Manhattan Express at the New York New York
Any thoughts?
If they decided to build a second one, they'd just call it The Other Roller Coaster. ;)
MAGXL200 said:
First you got a link proving this. I dot feel like googling it right now. Also I think it sucks lol. Sry, I totally see your point, but I think thats like changing the name of Corvette to A Car. its just lame and uninteresting.
If you had read the entire first post, you would have noticed I HAD posted a link.
- R.A
I'm wondering if they had any issues with people not putting the rollercoaster and the name "Manhattan Express" together when trying to locate the ride. Now, if they see signs for The Rollercoaster it should be painfully obvious.
"Rollercoaster 1 looks too intense for me".
"I'm not paying that much to go on rollercoaster 1 !".
And my favorite< & you all knew this was coming>
"Rollercoaster 1 has just crashed!".
The casino was pretty cool! The ride was hideous.
You must be logged in to post