Posted
A 55-year-old man died on Saturday when he fell out of the Superman roller coaster at Six Flags New England. It is not yet clear how the man fell out.
Does anyone have any pics of the difference between the curved restraints and the older models? I lookd on RCDB and couldn't find any pics that clearly showed the difference, thanks!
*** This post was edited by lilspike333 5/1/2004 11:19:16 PM ***
Thanks for posting those pictures, mantis man. From the pictures, it looks like the TTD-style restraints fit higher up on the person's waist then the MF style restraints. (Never ridden a coaster with the curved style, so unsure.)
Just a quick question: Someone mentioned the accident rate on the Intamin restraints, and I did a few quick searches, and couldn't find much info on that. I've always gotten the impression that the Intamin restraints had a good track record and I've always felt reasonably secure in them. (It's been a year or so since I've been on the boards, so I might have missed a few things. If so, any links that are floating around?)
Whatever the cause for this tragedy is, I do hope that if its a restraint design issue, they are able to identify and correct it so that this sort of thing doesn't happen again...*** This post was edited by OnLiftHill 5/1/2004 11:39:35 PM ***
My thoughts are with everyone involved.
I honestly don't know what to think. I know we don't have all of the details yet but I'm still so cynical over the intamin restraints. S:ROS is hailed as such a great ride because of the intense airtime and the freedom of the restraints. This is one ride I actually WANT to be stapled into.
I will say this now. I wouldn't be surprised if these recent incidents with Intamin's rides lead to modified restraints. I don't think OTSR's are out of the question either. Maybe not OTSR's but more of a butterfly restraint (X). I wouldn't object to that at all.
I wonder how this will affect the ride's future as well. This is the second incident on this ride. Will people of a higher power decide that this ride just should not be run? I personally love this ride and it is my #1 coaster. However, even I am beginning to question its safety.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Northeast/05/01/coaster.death.ap/index.html
The victim's 82-year-old mother, Germaine Mordarsky, told The Hartford Courant her son had cerebral palsy and used a scooter for transportation. She said her son liked to visit the park 90 miles west of Boston two or three times a year.
"I can't understand why they would let him on a ride like that in the first place. He was so sickly and handicapped. I just can't believe it," she said.
That the guest was not an able-bodied rider likely has something to do with this incident. But that's just speculation!
So if this person said they were able to meet the ctiteria, you CAN NOT deny them a ride!
So if the ridership questions were asked and they meet the criteria, the only one to blame would be the local, state government, or federal government for imposing these restrictions on the parks.
But do you think the entire track and load area of all coasters should be covered by video cameras ?
Or would that cause even more problems as the news people would sue to get the footage of accidents.
Not to mention what the attorneys would say it shows in court.
Or would it help the parks get rid of rule breakers and unsafe riders (like the casino's ban cheats and card counters)
*** This post was edited by kevin38 5/2/2004 4:52:39 AM ****** This post was edited by kevin38 5/2/2004 4:57:26 AM ****** This post was edited by kevin38 5/2/2004 5:03:17 AM ***
It is impossible that this sort of accident could have been preventable by video camera. This has been discussed before, under the Big Thunder Mountain Railway Accident topics.
Also, you cannot simply get rid of rule breakers and unsafe riders. How would you know? You can get rid of rule breakers, but it is hard to observe. I don't really think this man was an unsafe rider; just that he had this disease, but shouldn't have been allowed on the ride, but the park's only defense is asking.
*** This post was edited by 5/2/2004 7:27:16 PM ***
At the time I thought it was just closed due to typical maintenance issues(our ride has become more problematic lately) & they wouldn't say why it was closed at all.
It wasn't until this morning that I got an email from my friend linking to this thread that I learned what happened at SFNE,although my mom told me she heard something about an accident on a ride when I got home last night...we were the last ones out of the park thanks to a mini ERT session on Wild one.
This is really bad for the park & for SF in general,we've had so many accidents already this year & the Intamin hypers in the SF chain have had numerous mishaps since opening(SFDL rider falls out,SFNE brake failure resulting in a crash,SFA again another brake failure but thankfully no crash & now a man has died)and I won't be too suprised to see these rides either modified or removed all together from their respective parks if this keeps up.
It is really tragic & sad when friends & family go out to visit their local park expecting to have a day of fun & then someone's life is cut short because of something like this happening.
I was not stating that a video camera would have stopped accident.I was asking if it would Help the investagation.Second I did not state that it would stop rule breaking but a video is hard to rebut when the rider states I did not break the rules. A camera would be a cheap addition to a ride that costs millions.
You must be logged in to post