I've seen and heard good things about this heck of a roller coaster, RCMAC. Totally worth the time and effort.
I read last night that 2160 feet of track is being changed to iBox. That's more than half of it.
I develop Superior Solitaire when not riding coasters.
It's uncharted territory.
That said, if not now, then what happens in a few years time when the rest of the Topper Track gets swapped for iBox?
(Also, does anyone really care? It's a coaster.)
I develop Superior Solitaire when not riding coasters.
Lord Gonchar said:
That's what she said.
I prefer the British version of that observation:
"As the actress said to the bishop."
I develop Superior Solitaire when not riding coasters.
But was the Rod black?
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
Also, I genuinely can't tell the difference in the I-Box and Topper track styles in terms of ride experience. They're both super smooth and indistinguishable from a traditional tubular steel coaster, as far as I'm concerned.
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
I haven't been on the topper, but considering that it's the part the wheels touch, I can't imagine they would feel particularly different. Did it start as topper? I guess I never really paid attention, but the lift in photos always looks a little gnarly to be launching trains up it.
This is the ride where RMC threw some contractor under the bus for their quality of work, wasn't it?
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
It's one of two projects I know of where RMC blamed a contractor for a major engineering error. I don't know if this is because RMC got their specifications wrong, or because the contractor supplied product that did not meet specifications. Either way the result is a faulty end product, and I suspect that the customer doesn't really care who made the mistake.
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
/X\ _ *** Respect rides. They do not respect you. ***
/XXX\ /X\ /X\_ _ /X\__ _ _ _____
/XXXXX\ /XXX\ /XXXX\_ /X\ /XXXXX\ /X\ /X\ /XXXXX
_/XXXXXXX\__/XXXXX\/XXXXXXXX\_/XXX\_/XXXXXXX\__/XXX\_/XXX\_/\_/XXXXXX
RMC threw Velocity under the bus for the launch, but the more persistent issue seems to be that the ride is tearing itself apart, which is evidenced by the fact that the launch hardware is still in place but the track is being replaced. You'd think this would have to fall under RMC's responsibility, no?
Between this and the issues that Cedar Point has had maintaining the structure of Steel Vengeance, it makes you wonder why RMC is having trouble accounting for the stresses of their rides.
You must be logged in to post