I would probably choose get rid of that stupid Space Shuttle America and put in a nice bright colored floorless over in that area.
--What kind of floorless would you prefer, larger (Scream/Medusa), or smaller (Batman:DKnight)?
While I would prefer obviously a larger one, I would be totally content with a smaller version, such as Batman: Dark Knight, I would be ecstatic to have another intense coaster at the park. I think the park would be nice with maybe another cobra roll, or even a park 1st...an immelman, yeah....
--Name?
I've always had a thing for the name Warlock, dunno why, I just think it's cool.
--Colors?
I absolutely love the medusa colors of that yellow/purple combo..something bright and eye-catching!!
--Theme?
Who knows, this is Six Flags, either we get it or we don't. lol.
What are your thoughts...not saying that this is going to happen, but share your thoughts if it WERE to happen.
-Jeff-
As for what I'd want, I'd love a seven inversion, three train coaster with a height around 160ft and a batwing instead of a cobra roll. Around 4,000ft in length would be nice, too.
I think a good seven inverted would be good too, It'd be cool to have straight drop and maybe a huge overbanked turn or a new kind of inversion. 8 c.p.t., minimal midcourse braking, and a killer barrel roll.
-Mark
Never Has Gravity Been So Uplifting.
-Nate
*** Edited 12/12/2003 11:02:23 PM UTC by coasterdude318***
We havn't even heard too much about what SF parks are getting in 04 yet(aside from Tornado at SFFT) so maybe we should hold off on it until sometime around july or so when we see track or construction preps going on at any SF parks.
Besides if you guys get something new for 04 at SFGRAM the chances of getting anything big in 05 are greatly reduced.
BATWING FAN SFA said:
No offense guys but what makes you think they're getting a floorless in 05 at SFGRAM?
I don't believe anyone said SFGAm is getting a floorless in '05. A floorless is simply the most logical (and obvious) next big addition to the park. Certainly you wouldn't argue that SFGAm will never get another big addition, would you? Of course not. Which is why we're simply discussing what we would like to see/what can be expected from a SFGAm floorless, not when we will see it.
Besides if you guys get something new for 04 at SFGRAM the chances of getting anything big in 05 are greatly reduced.
Is that why we just got a major new coaster this year and it's looking like we will get at least something next year? Six Flags realizes the importance of its biggest parks, and realizes that additions to those big parks help the corporation in general.
Adix: I agree with you; the thing about "nothing being able to fit where Demon is" is complete BS. That ride is huge and takes up a heck of a lot of space. Getting rid of Demon also frees up area between Eagle and where the Demon is now. That's not to say I want the Demon to go (I think it fills a niche nicely) but that argument is bogus. The plot of land it sits on isn't the widest (and thankfully couldn't fit a Medusa East clone because of that ride's footprint) but the Demon plot of land is *very* long and there's plenty that could easily go there should Demon be removed.
-Nate
I would also place it in the Space Shuttle America area as it is a dead section of Carousel Plaza.
X Factor
got a quick question.......why do some people refer to a park as "we" "our" and "us"..........am i missing something here??
There are no bad coasters, only better coasters!!
BATWING FAN SFA said:
No offense guys but what makes you think they're getting a floorless in 05 at SFGRAM?
quote]The question I ask is why would you want a floorless? As Coasterbruh said above, the last thing you need up there is another coaster, very similar to, or a combination of Raging Bull, and Batman, but in a floorless config. Big deal. I really like floorless coasters, but the concept is lost after the front seat.
Your line-up at SFGam is sweet. Leave it alone, or add an Intamin. Granted, like THAT'S gonna happen. ;)
The Flying Turns makes all the right people wet - Gonch
Wouldn't it be wonderful on a floorless to see midways and rides below you!
Have Fun!
Paul Drabek
Negative-G Amusement Parks and Rollercoasters: www.Negative-G.com
coasterbruh said:
Does SFGAM really need a floorless..................with all these other coasters out here why only limit it to just that. Besides whats soo special about a floorless? Same track, same type inversions.
No. IMO, SFGAm doesn't need anything, as the park already has what I think is probably the best coaster collection on the planet. However, as I said above, SFGAm will certainly get a major new ride some day, and a floorless makes the most logical sense. What else would you expect?
The only thing SFGAm "lacks" is a large megalooper, which is exactly the niche a floorless coaster would fill. Nowhere in the park is there a dive loop, and the only cobra roll is on an inverted shuttle. It's not like we currently have a big sitdown looper (like SFGAdv did when they got their big floorless - and that seemed to go over just fine).
How about an aquatrax or a complete circuit launch coaster.
The watercoaster would be fine with me, but what unique niche does a complete circuit launch coaster? V2 already has the launch. The rest of the circuit would be loops and turns (which would be similar to a floorless, which you already ruled out).
got a quick question.......why do some people refer to a park as "we" "our" and "us"..........am i missing something here??
That's how people frequently discuss their home parks. That's just the way it is.
nasai said:
The question I ask is why would you want a floorless?...Your line-up at SFGam is sweet. Leave it alone, or add an Intamin. Granted, like THAT'S gonna happen.
I don't think anyone is really actually hoping for a floorless above all else. It's just that a floorless coaster is the next most obvious addition. You basically answered your own question; I'm sure most people would be more thrilled to have an Intamin, but it's just not going to happen. A floorless, on the other hand, is a pretty logical adition.
-Nate
You must be logged in to post