Posted
Cedar Point has imposed restrictive measures on its Millennium Force roller coaster in the wake of the accident that killed a man at Six Flags New England. The changes come down from the manufacturer, and prevent many guests that could ride in previous years to ride today.
Read more from WEWS/Cleveland.
If every single coaster at Knoebels were closed I'd still enjoy my day there. I have the Flyers, Haunted Manions, flume, Fascination, Whipper, Dodgems, and a slew of other rides to keep me busy.
Impulsive - you're right, I don't understand how you feel and it was not my intention to offend you or anyone who can't survive a day at Cedar Point without Millennium Force. I'm sorry I offended you.
mOOSH - who wonders what the hundreds of millions of people who visited Cedar Point prior to 2000 did for fun.
*** This post was edited by Mamoosh 5/20/2004 2:55:12 PM ***
Brett - who wonders why the argument isn't universal if it really applies, so wonders why people don't say "oh well, we got along without it before" when the power goes out ...
I have a feeling that slack will be determined much as it is on Xcellerator at Knotts. On that ride the belt is checked by pulling on the loose end. You may be able to connect the belt and not ride, which almost happened to me. Luckily it was something else in the way that once moved created enough "slack" for me to ride. The standard I was told was that there had to be two inches of loose belt from the buckle. They would tug at it if it wasnt there and if the tug failed to create that two inches of slack than you would not be riding...
By the way, does anyone know if that claim above about the PP accident involving the woman being ripped in half is true? I have not heard that before and it sounds hard to believe.
I appreciate your opinion, it happens to differ from mine but that's OK. I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree and leave it at that ;)
mOOSH
And I'm not a power enthusiast so perhaps that would give me some room to complain ;)
You people and you're agreeing to disagree ... you people are all way too pacifist; aren't there any good firey Italians to argue with out there? ;)
*** This post was edited by Impulse-ive 5/20/2004 3:43:10 PM ***
Am I the only person who sees this connection?
(Please note: This post is not intended to offend anyone in any way, just in case somebody wants to take offense to it)
While I wouldn't be happy if that move was made, even though I can fit on any ride easily, saftey comes first.
I am all for safety, and anything that lowers the risk of fatalities has to be good, but I have ridden hundreds of coasters. Many have caused me slight injury because of being cramped, small and restricitve in that way, but none have restrained me in a way that I have felt is unsafe.If I can fit in a coaster seat, and the restraints fit safely, then i consider it my personal choice to risk the odd knock on my knees or whatever if it means I can do something I love. Surely, as well as the recent tragedies on rides, part of these new restrictions is down to the sue for anything culture that has grown, and parks are needing to be over cautious with their health and safety rules to minimise the prospects for legal action.
The fact is, op error. Nothing else. While it's unfortunate in the business, people get lazy sometimes and don't check. It's gotta change. And another fact is the parks you see these things happening at don't remind their ops enough how serious their job is.
It's a shame society has made life a full-blown joke, with the punchline as death.
if they would just come out with a statement that said "this season we are doing the seatbelt thing and NEXT season, MF will be retrofitted with NEW restraints, allowing a greater number of our guests to ride."
i have to say, for me, anyways, something like that would make all of this go away. just knowing they are working on a permanent, REAL solution would go a long way!!
You must be logged in to post