Now their copying B&M rides?!?!
Thats like having Toyota try to build a Beemer. Just kidding with that one. :) *** Edited 5/14/2005 6:16:04 PM UTC by Corkscrewy***
i'm not sure what to put here..
As far as I'm aware Anaconda has a completely unique layout.
If you're saying they stole the idea for an inverted coaste, well then so did Vekoma, you can even say B&M based their idea off the Arrow suspended coasters.
Also if you take a look you will see thet Anaconda has 2 across seating where as B&M coasters have 4.
I don't see what your issue is.
Do we all know this?
Some of us know that Giovanola came up with the box track (see Z-Force/Shockwave), the four across stand-up, the first generation freefalls and more or less anything that is referred to as INTAMIN up to the mid-nineties.
Gio used to build all this stuff for Intamin and Bolliger and Mabillard used to be on Giovanolas payroll before they formed their own office.
Sadly, after a history of being a huge steel manufacturer and builder for over a hundred years, Giovanola went out of business a few years ago.
Two obvious differences:
1. There is a 540 degree spiraling downward helix.
2. There is a double corkscrew - something you don't find on Beemers.
And of course, there is very elaborate scenery and there are 2-across trains, not 4-across, as pointed out by Danimal - all that B:TR doesn't have.
Ummm...corkscrewy? Did you check out the other photos of that coaster? The only thing similar to B&M's Batman is the first three inversions.
I don't see the big deal here.
Number one: It's not a big deal, just interesting.
Number two: The first three inversions of any B:TR (and this ride, too, it would appear) are about half of the entire ride. More, if you count the lift hill and first drop.
Number three: I did look at the other pictures, and while the rest is not identical with B:TR, I found it to be highly reminisent of that storied coaster form.
Off hand, it does look quite a bit rip-offish, to me. But, since B:TR is such a great coaster, and B&M and Giovanola may have some sort of working relationship, I just think it's neat and kind of wierd to see a ride that looks so much like a B:TR but isn't.
http://www.coasterforce.com/info/bm/index.php
Hope these two links are able to clear up the confusion between the two companies. *** Edited 5/15/2005 6:46:52 AM UTC by Al Miner***
The second article however is pure fantasy and a reason why that website has its notorious reputation. I actually laughed several times when I read this hillarious story. Or did you know that the term "inverted" coaster was coined by a british kids-tv presenter in 1994 in referrence to Nemesis?!? And didn“t we all suspect that Drachenfire was originally designed by B&M but built by Arrow (for whatever reason)?!?
The myth of B&M is really becoming an urban legend in the enthusiast world.
*** Edited 5/15/2005 9:06:05 AM UTC by tricktrack***
In my not-so-humble opinion, Anaconda is the best inverted coaster I have ever been on for sheer relentless non stop intensity.
I develop Superior Solitaire when not riding coasters.
And you're right corkscrewy... if I didn't know, I would say that was a B&M Invert being built. Same track, supports, everything.
(Those seats looks UNCOMFORTABLE! They also appear to use fin braking instead of box-beam B&M brakes. *** Edited 5/15/2005 4:07:21 PM UTC by pkidelirium***
This is the same company who built what most consider the worlds most intense elements on a coaster, the Goliath and Titan helices
You must be logged in to post