Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
The Soriani and Moser Super Loop on Top racks on something like 6 trailers and Jump, I'd argue, is about that size -- if not bigger.
--Madison
The biggest question would be if the main boom structure even comes apart enough to keep the wieght load down for interstate U.S. travel. It could be like the Top Spin and have a main piece that is just too big. The bottom line, IMHO, is that even if you could make the Jump road legal on four trailers (plus a crane), why would you? I would bet than an operator could make more money with a Top Scan or Shake, which each need 4 trailers, if they wanted a signature piece, a Zamperla Turbo Force if they wanted a high-dollar ride or a Bertazzon Music Express if they wanted a high-throughput ride. There are just a lot of better economic options for rides to buy new, or used with a better maitenance history, than this particular Jump.
Adam
My wondering is when the Jump will make its way to Astroworld ;)
When you visit the Huss website, the schematic shows the Jump trailer and main boom assembly as all one piece. So that's probably one trailer. Take off the gondolas and that could be two trailers. And then maybe the the operator's booth and floor are on a third/fourth trailer. Of course I'm totally guessing, but the ride obviously didn't walk to Great Adventure.
I know I'm totally hypothesizing, and that the ride may never see the light of day again, but damn that was a great ride, and I really want to see someone put it out on the road again.
I think, as Adam said, the biggest problem would be the boom that it sits on. It may still be just too heavy. I think the problem still lies in the fact that if they couldn't get it to work in a static location, I don't see how it could be gotten to work on the road. Wishful thinking, yeah, but it is unrealistic.
I'll tell you a fun ride. Rock-O-Planes. Those are so silly!
True, but it didn't travel there like it was racked and owned by a carnival. Most likely it got there like a lot of rides did- shipped to the port in Newark and sent in shipping containers (or laid directly) on flatbed trucks to Great Adventure. Nitro was shipped via truck, but I wouldn't call it a portable coaster.
Adam
The last thought that'll I'll have on the Jump is "How do we know that they ever really tried to get it working?" It's not like having all the flats running at Great Adventure was ever a priority, which explains why they removed the Frisbee this year. Not once out of four trips over the course of three years did Evolutuion (the ride now known as Excalibur) ever run. They move it another park and it works. In comparison, I got two rides on the Jump. *** Edited 6/12/2004 9:56:14 PM UTC by Intamin Fan***
Adam *** Edited 6/13/2004 3:41:38 AM UTC by LONNOL***
You must be logged in to post