Posted
The Mad Tea Party ride at Disneyland with 18 giant spinning teacups was recently modified in the name of safety to make it harder for people to spin.
Read more from AP via The Sacramento Bee.
I don't really think California is the only state with a litigious population.
Anyway, this is pretty sad (the "taming" and tha blanket statement).
This is not a recent development...those cups have been difficult to spin for a long time.
mOOSH
-----
wow...gotta love that media!
i agree that the tea cups were never all that easy to spin in my lifetime...i read somewhere that the first incarnation of the ride (about where Dumbo sits today), that they didnt have anything to slow them, not even a brake for loading. as a result you could a acheive really high speeds. when they rebuilt it where it is now they made it harder to turn and added the brake for loading and unloading.*** This post was edited by haiderodes 3/2/2004 12:50:00 PM ***
mOOSH
I agree that many of the older rides will start disappearing with this trend that is occuring. People look at Theme Parks as $$$ and with the slightest problem they are ready to sue. Call it as to greed, poor economy, a way to build up one's bruised ego, or just plain advice (from legal or non-legal sources), the attitude of the people keep this momentum going.
While a lawsuit is necessary for a ride malfunction,or a case of poor maintainace, that leads to injury or death, but how many are due to the reasons listed above?
I am so happy to have ridden coasters with stationary lap bars (and great Neg-G forces), Hey-Deys, the Steeplechase Horses, great Fun Houses with spinning barrels and discs, Cuddle-Ups, Circle Swings, Frolics and Boomerangs (the old fashioned flat ride not the newer looping coaster) and I feel sorry for those that lost that opportunity.
People have ruined it for themselves
Did I mention a woman had an aneurysm after riding Monkey Business over and over?
About the Disney Tea Cups, being a little kid it didn't matter how fast we spun. Any speed felt fast. I don't think many people will care.*** This post was edited by GoliathKills 3/2/2004 8:07:22 PM ***
And the thing is, I don't really even believe that it's greed driven by the litigants - I think the motivating force behind all of it is the legal profession. I think the legal profession right now has more power in this country than the government (government officials can be sued right? So there ya go ... )
It's seriously scary ...
Brett - who's debating moving to Canada before the lawyers begin to spawn from spores on gym floors ... oh wait, they're already doing that ...
I don't claim to be an expert, but from the stuff I've read---the "common carrier" categorization of amusement rides could be the most devastating regulations the industry has ever seen. Some insiders predict every coaster in CA would have to be slowed should this come to be!
Check this link to see what I'm talking about.
http://www.intix.org/article_detail.cfm?ID=9938
These are not my opinions. I'll leave it to the supposed experts.
At issue is whether an amusement park should be considered a "common carrier," a century-old legal term to describe a business that carries the public.
If so, the amusement park would be required to exercise "utmost care" in operating its rides, rather than the current standard of "reasonable care."
If the state Supreme Court upholds the appellate court ruling, amusement park officials said they could be forced to slow down attractions.
"No one will get on amusement rides, because they'll be boring. They'll all be kiddie merry-go-rounds," said industry attorney Wayne Pierce.
"If you now subject everything to being toned down, that could easily become the end of the amusement industry and the birth of a meditation industry."
P.S. This sentence seems to indicate that CA is indded singled out on this issue!
Industry officials said redefining amusement parks as common carriers could conflict with state regulations and could increase insurance costs, force the redesign of attractions, drive away customers and prevent ride manufacturers from doing business with California parks. *** This post was edited by Jeffrey R Smith 3/2/2004 10:49:34 PM ***
mOOSH
You must be logged in to post