I know you've talked about hearing that dangerous things may have been happening at the park with some of the employees, but I was hoping the retraining process they mentioned at NCC was going to change that anyways. It seems like they were on the right track at that point. I just hate that everyone is talking about SFWOA as if it was dirt and did nothing for the amusement industry and now the Cedar Fair is subtracting some of the things I liked about the park, some people seem to be really interested. I never saw uncleanliness, rude employees, unsafe conditions, and all myself, so if you'll see from my perspective, a lot of it is hard to understand. I think their eyes were just bigger than their stomachs could handle, so little problems may have come up here and there.
CF has the advantage here in not having to hire the number of people needed for the WL side, so it will look as if everything is much better too. If SF only operated the rides side (I thought 2000 at the park was incredible), it probably could have worked out. But still, the wildlife side mixed with some rides over there was really interesting and it was a real megapark like I hadn't seen before. And I'll never be able to see it the same way again. :(
I'm not turning my back on the park or anything though. I'm still listening...
-Danny *** Edited 3/10/2004 9:12:37 PM UTC by Koaster King***
Impulse-ive said:
Their pass isn't and really now that I think about it, SHOULDN'T be accepted anywhere else.
Except I shouldn't have to pay for another SF season pass. I don't care if GL doesn't accept any other SP. I don't really want to visit the park again anyway!
The problem I have is I should not have to pay for another SF pass when the one I have has already been used! SF already has my $60 for my 2004 season pass, why should I have to go to another SF park and pay for another season pass?
*** Edited 3/10/2004 9:15:58 PM UTC by rOLLocOASt***
Antuan said: I wonder if this means that all their debt will be all paid off? I heard it was somewhere in the neighborhood of 500 milllion (I may be wrong though)
Their debt is $2 billion. They still have a long way to go.
There are far bigger issues for the parks to worry about, but this little detail DOES affect the consumer in the process. The simple solution would be "that Six Flags pass is still good at Six Flags parks, next year you'll have to get it elsewhere".
--Greg
"You seem healthy. So much for voodoo."
My favorite MJ tune: "Billie Jean" which I have been listening to alot now. RIP MJ.
Now me? Screw SF, gimme GL ;) (loved the rides, hated the service ... )
Now instead of costing about $30 it'll cost about $130. Does anyone know if CF allows you to buy day passes online? Do you think that option will be available for GL? I know the park passes are A LOT cheaper with that option. *** Edited 3/10/2004 9:35:15 PM UTC by rentzy17***
-Danny
This would work even better if they do turn GL into an excellent family park, as that's who the hotels are really aimed at.
The Coaster Kid
Roller coasters are more than just rides, they're a reason for living
But having thought about it I agree with Koaster King on many points. One of the things that made SFWoA a unique experience was the wildlife side. As an avid scuba diver I loved spending time in the aquarium and watching the shows on the wildlife side. By losing that aspect of the park, CF is killing something that is special to a lot of patrons.
Without the wildlife the park is a run of the mill amusement park. Sure they have a couple of outstanding rides, but what exactly do they have to offer to out of state families (not enthusiasts) to convince them to spend a day at GL instead of CP or on the beach? I can't think of anything. The concept of getting into the bus with your kids and riding for over an hour with several other families to ride a floorless or flying coaster doesn't sound that appealing to me, even as an enthusiast.
Another point that was brought up before was relating the Disney parks and the Universal parks and how they all succeed in close proximity to this issue. I don't think that you can point to Disney to say that this will be successful for CF. Each Disney park offers something different to its guests. I haven't been to any of the Universal parks, but it appears that IOA is an amusement park full of thrill rides and USF is more about the making of the movies with some thrill rides. What is unique between CP and GL for the average guest. The wildlife would be something, but now it's gone. They are basically the same thing in the eye of a regular person, one's just bigger.
Now don't get me wrong. Anything can happen here. It depends on how GL is marketed. I was merely focussing on earlier statements stating how GL will help CP bring in more people and get them to stay longer. Maybe, but I think that's pushing it.
Incidentalist said:
As an avid scuba diver I loved spending time in the aquarium and watching the shows on the wildlife side.
As an avid Scuba Diver it pained me to see the condition the aquatic animals were in when I visited that park. While I'm glad the animals won't be there anymore, it upsets me that they are still in Six Flags custody.
Certain victory.
I'd agree, but like you say if the wildside part of the park was there, and if they really make an excellent family park out of the old Worlds of Adventure than I'd defintly be willing to hop on a bus with kids for an hour+ bus ride since the park would offer something very diffrent than what Cedar Point offers. I'm not saying that Cedar Point isn't a family park, but having the wildlife at GL is what would make it really stand out.
The Coaster Kid
Roller coasters are more than just rides, they're a reason for living
but what exactly do they have to offer to out of state families
They're not going to go after out-of-state families. They're looking for the single day visitors from the immediate region.
Cedar Fair has zero experience with animal operations. It would be silly for them to get into that business. Plus this opens the door for all kinds of options down the road. It's a little early to say the temporary closing of that side means anything.
Walt Schmidt - Co-Publisher, PointBuzz
Cedar Fair got GL for a steal...much less then what Six Flags put into it. When you combine the passholder revenue from food, games and merchandise with the great deal they got, they'd be even farther ahead. So from my point of view, season pass financials should not even be an issue.
Couple of points here. Cedar Fair never got the revenue for those season pass sales already made by Six Flags. That and with the low price they were already sold at might be the reason why they are not honoring the passes at other locations. It sucks but they are running a business
I think it's kind of silly to say that neither park chain's pass will work there. Doesn't seem like good business sense to me. I really don't know what they are thinking. How do they expect to attract people to GL this year, if they cut it's size in half and put up barriers to current passholders of either chain?
I think in the long run this will be a good thing. But for this year...eh...I say they should have just closed the place for '04 and rebuild it the way they wanted. Would have made more sense to me.
*** Edited 3/10/2004 10:14:43 PM UTC by Coasterbuf***
Cedar Fair appears to be at least giving you an out by letting SFWOA passholders have a refund. To me, they want to see who really wanted to use those passes at SFWOA and get the value out of their pass at the home park. If the renewal price was $60, if you think you cannot get $60 of value in a single season at the revised GL, then it shows that Six Flags had some serious issues to correct even before it bought Sea World.
You must be logged in to post