Posted
The Toledo Blade reports, practically as a footnote, that CEO Dick Kinzel mentioned after the annual unit-holders meeting that Cedar Fair is considering the purchase of Paramount's Kings Island. The bulk of the story details how unit-holders complained about not being able to purchase 2-for-1 tickets.
Read more from The Toledo Blade.
I love Cedar Point and I love Kings Island.
I don't love the idea of Cedar Fair owning and operating Kings Island. Both parks are thrill parks but the guest experience is completely different in a way that the parks can distinguish themselves from each other.
Even though I don't like the idea of it, it's a pretty darn good buy and it's a great growth opportunity for Cedar Fair.
As far as the perks go to the shareholders, that is kind of crappy that they changed that for those who aren't season pass holders.
~Rob Willi
EDIT: Spelling*** This post was edited by beast7369 5/19/2006 10:29:04 AM ***
Can you Ohio-area locals shed light on how folks around the state view the parks? Like, is Cedar Point a must-do annual trip, or Kings Island, or both? Do they primarily draw from the surrounding areas, or do they draw solidly from all over? I'm just curious about the different dynamics for each park and how *potentially* having the same owner could affect it. For instance, down here in San Antonio, most folks know about or have been to SFOT. But having SFFT here makes a trip up to Dallas unnecessary... folks see Six Flags as Six Flags. Why go there if there's one right here?
Of course, I imagine CP and PKI are very well-established in Ohio, so maybe those issues wouldn't come into play. I'm curious what you think.
Because CF is always so proactive when they're sitting on a stinker of a woody.
I find it interesting comparing the nature of this potential sale to the secrecy and surprise that surrounded the Geauga Lake deal.
It's never been a secret that the Paramount parks were for sale. I would imagine the secrecy surrounding the GL deal was in part because PKS didn't want it known (for whatever reason) that they were shopping the park.*** This post was edited by Brian Noble 5/19/2006 11:08:43 AM ***
I wish they didn't have to change the Face/Off or Drop Zone names though. They're pretty original. I mean seriously, who would know they are movies unless they looked at the posters they put up on buildings next to them.;)
Tomb Raider and Italian Job would be EASY to alter to avoid paying for the rights. Same with Drop Zone and Face/Off.
The only rights that make sense to keep is Nickelodeon. Especially since Paramount just dropped a ton of money into getting rid of HB and creating Nick Universe.
Though I am not a fan of Nick stuff, I think CP would be foolish to dump the Nick theme unless Paramount asked for a rediculous amount of money. Kids seem to love it.
You must be logged in to post