http://www.amusementsafety.org/
To me, some of their numbers seem unreal. You should just look and see some of the comments (like the reported 85% of people who do not feel safe on Dragster) How much accredidation would you give this group? Any thoughts?
Thanks,
DMC
Is the point of your website to excite people about the industry( increase park attendance perhaps) or is it to scare people out of their minds about amusement parks( dropping attandance).
Why don't they go after the safety of other actually not safe industries instead like airplanes even.
-Eric: Major Parks: SFNE(homepark), SFA,SFGADV,CP,BGE,BGA,Kennywood,and Sea World: Track record 65 different coasters ridden #1 is Millennium Force #2 is El Toro and than there are all the others
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
Like Cedar Piont needs reminded that the Breakers is old. If memory serves, they seem to have rebuilt practically the whole place. Hell yes people are afraid on TTD. No one would ride it all if it wasn't intimidating.
Whats up with that list of supporters? Never trust anyone named 'Isreal'.
RamblinWreck said: (like the reported 85% of people who do not feel safe on Dragster)
What people "Feel" is not important. Real accident trends are.
"The Silver Bullet roller coaster is NOT worth the drive to Knott's Berry Farm according to 75% percent of those polled. The 75% indicating that it was plain and boring."
Now I will give $5.00 to anyone who can tell me how that is related to ride safety.
Interestingly, in the PKI section they include a review of Bubba Gump's...apparently they find the salmon sandwich very "safe" <G> *** Edited 4/22/2005 12:46:36 PM UTC by JZarley***
I imagine that many a lawyer would love to see this site.
If that site wants to be a credible source of information, they need to stop reaching so far as to what constitutes a trend, IMHO.
They also don't seem to understand the concept of a trend. A trend is a change in data with time. ie. More people are voting for Republicans in congressional elections today than 30 years ago. (With data to back it up.) It is not, "There are a lot of injuries reported on the XYZ coaster." If you can prove it and put a number on it, that is a data point, but not a trend.
The thing about it is, there is NOTHING specific on the site worth mentioning, and that will keep the .esq's away. Furthermore, it contains almost NO useful information.
The data they speak of is apparently based entirely on surveys or something; and by extension is apparently related to nothing more meaningful than the opinions of people who are probably not qualified to comment on the "safety issues" they refer to!
It reminds me of some of the user comments on that other ride accident site...I'm trying to remember...I think it's the Theme Park Insider site, where you can find all kinds of reports from people who were scared on rides and thought something was unsafe. You know, the "I couldn't believe the Enterprise doesn't have a seat belt" crowd.
Mostly harmless, but also mostly useless.
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
You must be logged in to post