Posted
Ohio Gov. Bob Taft yesterday signed a law exempting some workers from the newly increased minimum wage approved by voters on Nov. 7. Democrats accused Republicans of using the usually routine process of translating a constitutional amendment into law to write out some workers, including home health-care workers, amusement park employees, and agricultural workers at small operations.
Read more from The Toledo Blade.
I'd REALLY like to see a breakdown by age and gender of those working for minimum wage...can't help but think there's a LOT more to that picture than teenagers living at home with mom and dad.
Wish I had noticed this sooner.
According to the Dept. Of Labor:
As of 2005 (the latest info), 479,000 workers made the federal minimum wage of $5.15 and 1.9 million workers made less than that. Those folks represent 2.5 % of all hourly-paid workers.
There's more at the link. :)
So how that plays out is that 50% of minimum wage (or less) workers are over 25 and they represent 2% of all workers.
I think... :)
Here in PA, the minimum wage has been raised to $6.15 on January 1, and it will be raised to $7.15 on July 1. The $2.00 hourly increase works out to $4160 (gross) for a person working full-time. Of that, about 3 percent goes to state tax, and there will be the deductions for SS and Medicare. Many will find themselves in a higher federal tax bracket too (from 10 to 15 percent), and many people who didn't make enough to file before will have to file now. I wonder how much additional take home pay they'll actually end up with.
I read somewhere that in many retail and service places, the supervisors and managers are only making 7-9 dollars an hour. So now they'll barely be making more than minimum wage, but with much more responsibility than the minimum wage worker. Is that fair? Should they get a dollar or two an hour raise? And then what about the people making 10-12 an hour, and so on and on...?
What I'd be interested in seeing is a study of what people getting wage increases do with their increase in take home pay Do they try to save some or do they just go out and spend it? Do they spend it on necessities or frivolous things? There's probably not much difference whether the person makes 5 or 500 grand a year.
But all I can say to RGB's post is exactly, exactly, exactly.
Considering EVERYONE in the world would be highly educated and highly paid.
It wouldn't work that way. There's a finite number of jobs. If every single person went to college and got a degree, then you'd just have college educated people flipping burgers.
You think your doctor would take a second job to keep your gut full of fast food? What about when you are too lazy to get out of the car in the winter and pump your own gas? Do you call them idiots for stooping so low to do it for you?
Not one bit. In fact, I respect the work ethic. But the second they complain and claim to 'deserve' more, then the "who's fault is it really" arguement becomes valid.
Basically you have a crap job for one of two reasons:
1. It's meaningless to you. (high school kid, extra cash sort of thing, etc.)
or
2. You made some poor decisions and/or had some bad luck in life.
In the case of #1, the minimum wage thing is just as meaningless as the job. In the case of #2, well that's pretty much where the opinions/arguments in the thread come into play.
Based on the many viewpoints here, it seems most feel that raising minimum wage hurts more than it helps...even those making that wage.
LMStand, you're right that 15 cents more for a loaf of bread won't affect me much. But it will affect the people more just getting the wage increase. And probably by the time you add up the 15 cents more for bread, quarter more for milk, increases in produce, higher bus fare, and everything else that will go up to pay for increased labor costs, people making $7-something an hour won't be much better off than they were making $5-something.
You must be logged in to post