Last summer, I rode it replacement: Stitch's Great Escape.
And it is awful. The story is incredibly flat, the humor is nonexistant, the videos played throughout the ride are a joke, and it is far too short. Not only that, but it is actually disgusting when they shoot out Stitch's chili-dog breath at you. This ride flat out sucks.
It's a shame that Disney had to put down one of their best creations ever.
Have you ever seen a man eat his own face?
Have you ever seen a man eat his own face?
Agred re: the Stitch animatronic. The irony was the justification for shutting down AE was guest complaints. But, Stich ended up getting more complaints in it's first year than AE got in 5! *** Edited 1/20/2007 9:47:37 PM UTC by Peabody***
^ I agree about Journey Into Imagination. The 1999 version was a disgrace and I'm glad they changed it back to add Figment into the ride more. Nothing will ever compare to the original though but I hear rumors of Dreamfinder possibly coming back and I hope it is true. It's a shame so many dark rides from Epcot are either changed or gone for good.
June 11th, 2001 - Gemini 100
VertiGo Rides - 82
Yes...I'm a Disney geek! *** Edited 1/20/2007 10:36:33 PM UTC by Peabody***
But, I really did think it was the most thoroughly designed rides they have.
Bolliger/Mabillard for President in '08 NOT Dinn/Summers
I finally went in Stitch in October and it was a horrible experience. It's awful. Bad decision on that one.
Mike
Stitch's Great Escape is a joke. It was a quick fix for a far superior attraction.
The only problem with Alien Encounter was its location. If it were located near Rock n' Roller Coaster and Tower of Terror, the audiences would expect a mature ride.
Have you ever seen a man eat his own face?
zacharyt.shutterfly.com
PlaceHolder for Castor & Pollux
I totally agree that AE was far superior to Stitch in its execution and theme, but, let's face reasons why it was changed. The original show was much too scary for the Magic Kingdom, a park known for its family friendly offerings. (It was the only attraction that I'm aware of that literally showed a person being killed in it at Disney!) It also didn't sell merchandise like they thought it would, thus enter Stitch. More kid friendly and more merchandisable. (Funny thing I've heard, though, is that the Stitch merchandise isn't exactly flying off the shelves, either. Possibly a little better than AE, but not that much.)
Personally, I found the Stitch show unorganized and, well, stupid. But, my 8 year old son LOVED it, enough so that we had to endure the attraction TWO more times on our last trip! Apparently, the target market of school age kids seems to be working. Also, even though the Magic Kingdom was only moderately busy, with only about 20-60 minute waits for most of the more popular attractions, Stitch managed to have a good 45-60 minute line most of the day, with both theatres operational. Fastpasses seemed to be gone by mid-afternoon, too. I don't think I ever saw the line for Alien Encounter ever go more than 20 minutes except for maybe its first year or so in operation. Usually, it was a complete walk-on. So, based on these observations, perhaps Disney DID make the right marketing decision.
I also agree that if Alien Encounter was originally installed at Disney/MGM Studios, it would still be here today. But, because it was designed for the old 'moon theatres' of Flight to the Moon/Mission to Mars, that's where it ended up. And because it was too intense for the demographic audience of the Magic Kingdom (mostly young children and their families), the very frightening Alien was permanantly replaced by the gross, yet 'lovable' alien, Stitch. (At least lovable by the under 12 crowd!)
I believe almost all of us are aware of why the attraction was removed. Financially, it was probably the right move for the Magic Kingdom. However, they failed to deliver a solid attraction as its replacement and, because of such a thing, Epcot, Animal Kingdom, and MGM Studios are more popular choices amongst people 18 and older.
It's a shame it's gone, but I don't believe Disney wronged the general public by removing it. However, the location of the ride was awful, and that is something we can blame Disney on.
Have you ever seen a man eat his own face?
It is most instructive to note the ages of the kids they used in their "big kids" segment on this year's DVD to highlight all the "big thrills". Middle-school, tops. A big step down from last year's mid-20's-trying-to-be-a-teenager-Luke.
You must be logged in to post