Arthur Bahl said:
I do feel that Six Flags parking pricing is out of line except at SFMM, SFGAdv and SFKK. Its just another part of that "get 'em for everything you can" attitude. The sad part is that so many continue to put up with it. Maybe it is just that in many regions, if you want a lot of really big coasters, Six Flags is your only choice. In Ohio, where CP is present, SFO (SFWOF) sank like a lead balloon. (even though this was for reasons that have nothing to do with parking).Why do I make the exceptions? SFMM sits on that million-dollar-an-acre land and much of that is used for parking. SFGadv is close to New York City and prices in the region run high including parking. The above parks are also the biggest Six Flags parks. SFKK is unigue in that Six Flags doesn't own the parking so it is only $5.
Dude, SFKK parking is dollars. it's controled by the fair board and not SF.
Chuck, who thinks thats about right for any park.
One of the great things about living in Pittsburgh is that the parks within daytrip distance all offer good value. Needless to say, none of them is a Six Flags.
Arthur Bahl
Parks I visited this year
HW Free parking
SFKK 4 dollars
Strickers 3 dollars on the fourth for fireworks parking and free on family day and Guest apreciation day.
Fun Spot, Free
IB Free
Kennywood Free
Knoebels Free
-Mark
Never Has Gravity Been So Uplifting.
It seems no-one *****es about 10 bucks anymore. Give it time and CF will have their parking rates at 15 bucks.
I love small scale parks with free parking just as much as the next enthusiast but I also love the corporate parks due to alot of variety in one park.
If a place like HW continues to expect increased attendance to the point of 2 million that they are predicting, they will have to increase their capital. That means something is going to have to give in the pricing.
A park with 2 million guests a year is considered a large scale park IMO.
My favorite MJ tune: "Billie Jean" which I have been listening to alot now. RIP MJ.
Next year they will be taking a bit of a breather with just a themed Tilt-A-Whirl and a new water attraction but bigger things should be on the way in the future.
Because the park is privately held, they don't have to answer to Wall Street. Neither do they have to worry about paying big salaries to someone like Shapiro. What is more likely to happen is that the profits in the park will go back into the park in the form of new investments.
There are likely to be major expansions for another reason as well, to attract vacationers from outside the daytrip distance. This means places like Chicago, Nashville, Memphis and St. Louis. This means that the park will want to have enough attractions to encourage 2 or 3 day stays. Of course, other factors that could help are the free perks and fair pricing (which might attract visitors that are unhappy with Six Flags parks) and the closure of parks such as Libertyland and Santas Village.
What new would be expected in the next ten years. First, hello Easter Bunny! That's right, another theme area. Also more coasters including some steel. A mouse of some kind would be a likely possibility to start with but other ones might come later. Super expensive ones, however will be avoided to help keep the park affordable but that doesn't rull out a fairly big one if it is done right (Kennywood is an example of this with Phantoms Revenge). Also the park could use several thrill rides to give the park a broader appeal and to take more business from parks such as SFKK and SFSTL. Meanwhile, a strong emphasis on family attractions would remain with more darkrides, transport rides, family flats, and shows. As for Splashin' Safari, that will grow as well. The goal here would be to become the best waterpark in the region (if it isn't so already) and to provide ample slide capacity.
One thing that is not in the plans, according to Paula, is a park owned hotel. Still, the park needs to encourage the building of more accommodations in the area to meet the needs of vacationers that want to stay near the park.
Arthur Bahl
Chitown said:
The only reason SF is taking the heat for the parking rates is because some of their parks are the highest in the industry for parking.It seems no-one *****es about 10 bucks anymore. Give it time and CF will have their parking rates at 15 bucks.
I love small scale parks with free parking just as much as the next enthusiast but I also love the corporate parks due to alot of variety in one park.
If a place like HW continues to expect increased attendance to the point of 2 million that they are predicting, they will have to increase their capital. That means something is going to have to give in the pricing.
A park with 2 million guests a year is considered a large scale park IMO.
Variety yes. Large parks have that. Give me a park with a few good rides operated as they should and Im much happier.
Chuck, who hopes he don't see every coaster at HW some day with brakes all over them.
$15 parking, $60 admission, $3 bottled water, 2 hour lines, commercial advertising everywhere...Sorry Six Flags. I'm no longer interested.
1) Got 4 hours of ERT @ PPP, 2 slices of pizza and a soda.
2) Got all day admission to DelGrosso's AND had a delicious pasta dinner with bread, salad, and 2 drinks.
3) Same as #1 last year.
4) Same as #1 the year before that.
Anyone have any other alternatives?
Also if I had that extra $15 I probably would spend it somewhere in the park instead. Maybe I would eat in the park....maybe I would buy a souvenier, maybe I would pay for an upcharge attraction, maybe I would buy the lousy food just so I didnt have to leave. Maybe if I actually enjoyed myself more at most Six Flags parks (SFGAM - home park is different), I wouldnt complain about what I am paying to get in, paying to park, or paying to eat.
EDIT - additional comments. *** Edited 10/17/2006 12:22:00 AM UTC by beast7369***
Daniel Northover said:
Busch
Yea but you need to shell out nearly $300 to get that priviledge and it's only offered for the platinum pass....
You must be logged in to post