I know, he’s got an issue with that park even if it’s his “home park” I understand all too well. I have the same issue with SFGAm my “home park” that I don’t enjoy at all.
2025 Trips: Universal Orlando, Disneyland Resort, Knotts, Dollywood, Silver Dollar City, Cedar Point, Kings Island, Canada’s Wonderland, Busch Gardens Williamsburg, Sea World Orlando, Discovery Cove, Magic Kingdom
I found a YouTube video of the ride created in No Limits, going from the layout of the footers in the leaked plans. It looks like a great coaster with some unique elements. Not nearly as large as Gatekeeper though. I predict that it's going to be a winner, mountain or not.
-Travis
www.youtube.com/TSVisits
KD released a video. No mountain, but it looks awesome! This is almost exactly what someone recreated from footer plans a few weeks ago on another YouTube channel.
-Travis
www.youtube.com/TSVisits
That may not be possible---at least not at reasonable costs. The "wings" are quite far from the spine of the track, and carry a fair bit of weight. The stress on the connection points is correspondingly higher, and would require a LOT more material to keep it stable under the same forces that e.g. an invert experiences.
Yeah, I think the margin between too much and too little is pretty small. Wild Eagle is a lot, Windseeker it seems to depend, Thunderbird is just right consistently. The seats are so far out of the center line that you can't get too crazy.
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
I just don't get how probably one of the more fun parts of the (marketing?) job of coming up with a name/theme/color of a new ride can be done so... lazily?
It's just a name so whatever, but it's also such an easy thing to have fun with and be creative with. Just a bit annoying that parks don't do more with a simple name/concept. There had to be a better "Plan B".
You must be logged in to post