It all really depends on your definition of a roller coaster, but in my books, alpine coasters are roller coasters. By alpine coaster I mean the Wiegand models that run on steel track, not the alpine slides. On RCDB, the Alpine Coaster in Imst, Austria is about 11,500ft long, and that is over 3 thousand feet longer than Steel Dragon. What are your thoughts? Here's a link to the Alpine Coaster in Imst.
The good news is that you can decide for yourself and it can be anything you want.
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
CP Maverick said:
I think it's the owner of the track-based thrill ride that determines if it is a "roller coaster" or not.
It might be more precise to say that the owner of the track-based thrill ride determines if it owns a coaster or not. And that enthusiasts determine if that thrill ride meets their criteria for a roller coaster for purposes of keeping a track record. I don't if it's not so much "so much grey area" as it is different parties with different agendas.
Life is something that happens when you can't get to sleep.
--Fran Lebowitz
In this day and age, I think it's highly inappropriate for the owner, manufacturer, and even enthusiasts to determine whether or not a track-based thrill ride is a coaster. Has anyone thought about what the ride identifies itself as? Whether Steel Dragon 2000 has identified itself as the longest coaster in the world or a Tilt-A-Whirl, who are we to have the audacity to say otherwise?
Complete circuit, lift hill, steel rides need to check their privilege. They never have to deal with being confused for not-a-coaster.
- Julie
@julie
You must be logged in to post