To me it seems more about visual intimidation than anything else. I'm sure it's disorienting, but looks tamer than some of the other crazy flats out there. Yet it's very big, and very imposing, with all of those layers.
But this should soon be making the rounds and popping up on all of our Facebook feeds very soon, as discussed in so many other threads.
Tommytheduck said:
But this should soon be making the rounds and popping up on all of our Facebook feeds very soon...
It got passed around WAY more than I expected when I shared it yesterday. 563 shares so far in 32 hours.
It's kind of perfect for that sort of thing though. Like you said, visually it has a real "Holy ****" factor, but if you look closely, the actual ride path appears relatively tame. Which makes it a perfect ride for the real world. Hell, that's been B&M's modus operandi for most of their existence - visually intimidating structures that ride lighter and smoother than rides a fraction of the size. Makes for very pleased guests when they 'conquer' something like that..."Oh, it wasn't bad at all!"
Yeah, I don't imagine it would be any worse than a Power Surge. It doesn't move nearly as fast. Even a Top Spin appears more aggressive.
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
While I completely agree that a Power Surge and some cracked-out programs utilized on Top Spins are actually more aggressive than this, two things need to be stated:
1) This is obviously a prototype, so who knows how far they can turn it up. And...
2) For GP, the added moving components (while off-ride) will make this ride vastly more intimidating.
Either way, it looks to be a big win.
Edit: Gonch kinda voiced the same opinion on my 2nd point.
I'd like this better than a top spin because a top spin swings. The ride path has you just floating around. Like Jeff, Gonch, and Tommytheduck mentioned, it doesn't really look all that intense.
-Travis
www.youtube.com/TSVisits
I'd be getting on that crazy machine in a heartbeat if it showed up at a park I was visiting! It really doesn't look all that intense, just a lot of movement around it to make it look more disorienting. It also looks like it has one heck of a lighting package, making it really fun to photograph at night (and during the day with a good ND filter).
Original BlueStreak64
^So what you're saying is you could get the same ride experience at .01% of the ride cost, be way more reliable, and still serve the same number of people wanting to ride something with that many axes of rotation (i.e., VERY few)?
Having two gyrospheres might be over-buying... ;)
You still have Zoidberg.... You ALL have Zoidberg! (V) (;,,;) (V)
You must be logged in to post