The Hostyl One said:
"I agree that parks like SFWoA need to address other issues before resorting to a line-avoidance system. But for places like Disney, I think it was the best thing they could have done. YOU offer up a better solution."
DWeaver: You and I agree that SFWoA needs to work on other things first. I specifically asked you to come up with an alternate solution for Disney.
And why cant I compare to CP (people around here do it all the time)? SFWoA in particular has a ton of things to do as well when you figure in all the stuff on the life side not to mention Hurricane Harbor (or whatever they call the water park). However, I used CP as an example of how a pass can help.
And SFDLSuperman: You think that staying two days is any less expensive than a FastLane? With staying an extra day that is an extra day of meals and extra driving or hotel costs. Not to mention the time thing. I'd gladly pay an extra few dollars per person to do what I really wanted than pay the huge costs of a whole 'nother day when really all I wanted was an extra hour or so.
And I'm still not convinced that it makes coaster lines any longer (on the average) than without it. I'll cop that it makes the smaller rides and shops more busy, but I dont think that it increases the number of people that are riding or want to ride the coasters. If coaster waits are being extended, it's from shoddy operation, not increased people.
Just because the line looks shorter because you cant see the virtual queuers does not mean the line would be the same physical lenght as it would be if the people were physically standing there. I think people's perceptions weigh heavily into it.
jeremy
--- (this space intentionally left blank)