It might not mean much, but it would be nice to think it could be going somewhere close. The track looks orange, but my sister said it was Red. It looks like it is used, pretty sure it is.
What do you guys think?
*** Edited 1/4/2006 9:50:09 PM UTC by 99er***
-Chris
Negative-G Amusement Parks and Rollercoasters: www.Negative-G.com
The Mapquest link doesn't work for me, but to my knowledge that's the only reason for there to be used SLC track on the back of a flatbed.
[geez... I take two minutes to fact check on RCDB and PAH! Not one but TWO people beat me to it] *** Edited 1/4/2006 9:58:06 PM UTC by BBSpeed26***
Bill
ಠ_ಠ
Here's a link for the location of Lodi
*** Edited 1/5/2006 6:25:33 AM UTC by 99er***
I got it on my phone but I don’t know how to download them to the computer.
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
"The Future of Roller Coasters"
-RollerCoasterGod
*** Edited 1/5/2006 4:05:22 AM UTC by RollerCoasterGod***
Michael Darling said:
SFWoA volcano? I really missed that one. Somebody fill me in?
Back when the park went from SFO to SFWoA the park announced future plans to say how they wanted to more or less combine the parks. One of the main things they pushed to the public was, "Building a 6 acre lushly landscaped tropical land where guests will walk through a volcano and rain forest to reach numerous interactive areas with exotic birds, reptiles, flamingos, marsupials, swimming tigers and alligators." This was rumored, to go between the parks. Along with those plans, they also annouced a motion simulator IMAX movie, NEW deep diving submarine ride, constructing a monorail system and more.
"The Future of Roller Coasters"
-RollerCoasterGod
You must be logged in to post