At this time I doubt it. I don't think that the current mood in the house is toward more regulation. Also, I supspect that congressmen might be concerned about the possibility of being ridiculed for authorizing new regulation of "rollercoasters" since no passenger has died in a rollercoaster accident died since August of 1999. However, congress has done stranger things, especially when driven by a sensationalistic press.
By the way, Markey's bill would do far more than just require reporting of amusement ride accidents. It would bring fixed amusement rides fully into the realm of the CPSC. This would allow the CPSC to get a court order forcing the closure of a ride, though this type of thing is seldom done. I need to check further, but I think that it would also allow the CPSC to set design standards. I know that Markey would love to see a limit on G forces.
Are there any lawyers out there who can comment on the CPSC's ability to set standards?
*** This post was edited by Jim Fisher on 8/10/2001. ***