StealthmF5m3, you make a good point. I myself don't find the names boring, the most boring one at SFGAm is Demon, and it's still not very boring. So what if SF uses the license they have? Isn't that why they have the license to name things after characters? To name things after things people remember? Thats what I thought they were for.
Just Coasting, I wonder, do you bash everything unoriginal? Do you bash Interplay and Activision for making Star Trek themed games? Do you bash McDonalds for naming everything "McThis and McThat"? They name things after those things because they are licensed to do so, and it helps people remember it. Why would anyone waste thier money by buying a license to name something after a famous super hero, show, game, movie, or whatnot?
Oh, and about imaginging Millennium and Magnum... There is Millennium Force, and Millennium Roller Coaster, as far as Magnum goes, Magnum XL-200 and Magnum Force. And how about Gemini? At the same park, there is Gemini Jr. Should I go and complain that CP can't even name a coaster originally, and they are so bad that they name it after one already in their park?
-------------
7 Days left.
*** This post was edited by TrBiggar on 7/17/2001. ***