Six Flags posts $1.6 billion loss for 2025

Posted | Contributed by Jeff

From the press release:

2025 Fourth-Quarter Results

  • Net revenues totaled $650 million, down $37 million or 5% compared with the fourth quarter of 2024 -- on a per operating day basis, net revenues were up 7% compared with the fourth quarter of 2024.
  • Attendance totaled 9.3 million guests, down 13% or approximately 1.4 million visitors compared with the fourth quarter of 2024 -- on a per operating day basis attendance was down 2% compared with the fourth quarter of 2024.
  • Per capita spending(2) was $66.41, up 8% compared with the fourth quarter of 2024.
  • Net loss attributable to Six Flags Entertainment Corporation was $92 million compared with a loss of $264 million for the fourth quarter of 2024.
  • Adjusted EBITDA(1) totaled $165 million compared with Adjusted EBITDA of $209 million in the fourth quarter of 2024.
  • Operating days totaled 779, down 11%, compared with 878 days in the fourth quarter of 2024.

2025 Full-Year Results

  • Net revenues totaled $3.10 billion.
  • Attendance totaled 47.4 million guests.
  • Per capita spending(2) was $61.90.
  • Net loss attributable to Six Flags Entertainment Corporation totaled $1.60 billion, which reflects a $1.5 billion non-cash impairment charge on goodwill and other intangibles.
  • Adjusted EBITDA(1) totaled $792 million.
  • Operating days totaled 5,738.

super7*:

About six years ago, they used to count their season pass revenue over the first five visits so anything after that was considered zero revenue. If that’s still the case, then in their shortsighted minds, they were viewing all those season passholder visits at the holiday events as zero revenue visits. Which absolutely isn’t true because the revenue should be spread over all the visits that one person makes

Making my head hurt because by November nobody gives a @@@@ about unamortized pass revenue. . If they already amortized the Season Pass revenue earlier in the year, it has zero impact if they cut Winterfest. That cash was received and blown, it matters not whether you should have booked some revenue in December. (Yes in a perfect world you’d book revenue ratably over actual days used, but after 5/6 visits you’re talking about single dollars).

the calculus was/is “do winter events bring in more cash than you spend” and “how many season passes won’t get bought over winter and all next season if we cancel the winter event”.

Unless you’re saying that they normally book some of that new Fall pass purchase as revenue days (1 of 5 or 6), (2 of 5 or 6), etc., and thus new pass purchases (from Labor Day through Xmas) didn’t get any revenue recognized in Q4 because they were sitting under the Xmas tree and not yet activated?

if that were the case, they would have said that (huge amount of deferred revenue normally recogízed in Q4 now sitting on the balance sheet ready to hit the P&L in Q2). Yeah, that ain’t it.

Last edited by CreditWh0re,

So do they count meal plans the same way from revenue? After X number of meals they just don’t count them anymore as revenue? I’ve always wondered how they account for meal plans. I always found it interesting that the registers (at least at CF parks) range up the full price then zero-ed it out. Same with all-season drinks.


But then again, what do I know?

From Six Flags annual report:

Revenues from multi-use products, including season-long products for admission, dining, beverage and other products, as well as the
first 12-month period for membership products, are recognized over the estimated number of uses expected for each type of product. The estimated number of uses is reviewed and may be updated periodically during the operating season prior to the ticket or product expiration. The number of uses is estimated based on historical usage adjusted for current period trends. Membership products beginning with the 13th month following purchase are recognized straight-line. For any bundled products that include multiple performance obligations, revenue is allocated using the retail price of each distinct performance obligation and any inherent discounts are allocated based on the gross margin and expected redemption of each performance obligation. The Combined Company does not typically provide for refunds or returns.

ShaneDenmark:

the registers (at least at CF parks) range up the full price then zero-ed it out.

At KI they ring up a price that's around 75% of the real price then zero it out, same with drinks. There's a meal plan SKU they use. An $18 meal plus drink at Brewhouse rings up around $13 and $2 before the zeroing. Any accounting theories why they're doing that?

Last edited by metallik,
Fun's avatar

The $13 on the receipt is the approximate dispersion of what they account for per meal use. That value changes throughout the year to get the most accurate accounting possible.

But here’s the real story: A $99 meal pass, divided by $13 is about 7.6 meals per person for the season, requiring 3.8 visits at a minimum. So the park expects dining plan holders to visit less than 4 times. Passholders without a dinning plan visit less, closer to the 2-3 visit range.

Tommytheduck's avatar

But it can get way deeper than that. The actual cost to the park for the meal may only be $5.00. Which would mean that to truly lose money, the holder may have to eat 20x (ish.) And since the meal is "free," maybe they'll splurge on that $6 brownie or cookie that they otherwise wouldn't have bought. Or add the guac. Or have a beer.

You also have the harder to measure value of having the plan holders in the food line, or eating at a table. When the venue looks busy, people planning on doing a pretzel for dinner may see it and say "Wow, lots of people in there, must be good," and decide to try a meal instead.

Of course, what really cracks me up is entering the park on a 6pm-12am day and seeing people lined up at Backbeat for easily an hour.

Last edited by Tommytheduck,

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums - ©2026, POP World Media, LLC
Loading...