But the Shockwave really only needs to have it's transition into the mid course breaks redone, IMO and it could be very re-rideable again. Outside of that one area the ride was decent. Sure there was some shuffling but nothing that would ruin the ride. *** Edited 5/26/2004 5:50:35 PM UTC by beast7369***
Not to say that Six Flags might not someday pull a Phantom's Revenge, but I think that putting that amount of TLC into existing rides is more common to smaller parks like Holiday World, Kennywood and Knoebel's.
(I wouldn't be shocked if Elitch's follows up Halfpipe with a certain TOGO from New Jersey...)
By the way, "Counter," Shockwave was one of those rides that was good when it was new, but aged poorly. I hear SFGAdv's version (GASM) replicates that experience pretty accurately. *** Edited 5/26/2004 6:02:52 PM UTC by Olsor***
Was that cost-effective? Undoubtedly, but then Steel Phantom's lift hadn't already been dismantled.
--Greg
"You seem healthy. So much for voodoo."
I don't think it's very cost effective to modify it once it's already out of hte ground. Plus, one of the biggest knocks on those Arrow megaloopers, other than Viper SFMM (IMHO) is that they take up so much space. If a park did want to relocate Shockwave to their park, they'd need a LOT of space to construct the ride, either that or it'd require some major sitework to weave and wind it in with other attractions. That being said, the infield of GASM SFGAdv is one of the bleakest areas of land in a park!! *** Edited 5/26/2004 6:46:53 PM UTC by Impulse-ive***
mOOSH
Chuck, who agrees with that Chicago reporter refering to Superman "We gave up Shockwave for this?"
2022 Trips: WDW, Sea World San Diego & Orlando, CP, KI, BGW, Bay Beach, Canobie Lake, Universal Orlando
Of course, I'm so gullible I think the ride could be saved by replacing that ONE section of unbanked turn...so what do *I* know?
Shockwave won't ever become a copy of SFMM's Viper, but it SHOULD be able to become someone's decent mega-looper...and it'll *never* be as bad as PKD's Sh**wave, LOL....:)
I don't think it would be very cost effective, at all. Too compcact for a Jr. Hyper, with a strange footprint.
Edit: You guys beat me to it. *** Edited 5/26/2004 8:55:44 PM UTC by bigboy***
You must be logged in to post