That was until this year!!!!! By the end of the year I thought the darn thing broke both my jaws the last time I rode it. I didn't ride it again the remainder of the season and will not untill I get good word.
Chuck, saying Vortex looks alot nicer but rides much rougher. Re-guage time????/
-----------------
Charles Nungester
Park Jockey :)
Not everone finds it to be rough. I myself really enjoy the ride and have no problems riding it. I find the coaster to offer plenty of action and try to ride it at least once every visit. If the ride bothers you that much, just don't ride it again.
When Vortex opened, it was an absolute mind-boggling display of loops, drops and twists never before seen. The volume of new elements and sensations it provided challenged even the most seasoned coaster rider. It was and is a virtual showcase of distinct Arrow trademarks and elelments.
Why, I recall having to wait just to get up to the overlook fence to get a full view of the ride when it first opened. To this day, it still attracts nearly as many ooohs and ahhhs from spectators and nearly as many "you'll never get me on that thing" reactions by bystanders.
Vortex is an Arrow. And we all know that Arrow multiloopers do not hold up. (One notable exception... I personally think Loch Ness is easily the best Arrow looper ever built) Mr Toomer is to be congratulated on his distinct contributions to the world of coasters, however his genious did end with the ability to transition smoothly from one element to another.
Ultimately, I really don't see any point in comparing a 15 year old coaster to a 3 year old coaster. A lot has changed since then... for the better. But without coasters such as Vortex there would be no Face/Off.
Finally, Vortex is just simply fun to watch. With it's brand spanking new paint job, the ride still gets at least one good stare from me each time I visit PKI.
Shaggy
-----------------
Shaggy
A.K.A. John K.
Weird... I guess I never realized at the time how addicted to coasters I'd be after college.
These days, it's a neat ride to look at, but the ride is very hit and miss. I suppose it has something to do with wheel condition. There are only two notrious "evil Arrow transitions" that really bother me.
-----------------
Jeff - Webmaster/Admin - CoasterBuzz.com, Sillynonsense.com
"As far as I can tell it doesn't matter who you are. If you can believe, there's something worth fighting for..." - Garbage, "Parade"
And hey, i swear everyonce in a while in the back seat on that first drop I see god. Can't be too bad of a ride.
-----------------
"When I come to a town I would love to see a children’s festival and children’s choirs singing my songs - maybe create a children’s day! A Holiday! With parades and songs - oh, I would love that!" - I swear to god its a Michael Jackson quote
ravenguy98 said:
And hey, i swear everyonce in a while in the back seat on that first drop I see god. Can't be too bad of a ride.
-----------------
Right on Ravenguy98. That backseat ride is the absolute best there is, and what a first drop it is. The first drop on a lot of coasters doesn't "take" my stomach too bad, but for some reason Vortex really does a number on me. I love it!-----------------
God please let SFKK get something in 2002. ANYTHING!!
-----------------
Does CCI know how to make a bad coaster?
The slow corkscrews are due to a newer control system being placed on the ride only a few years ago, before then, it went through the 'screws quite fast.
As I have mentioned on other threads I have commented on, Vortex suffers from the mid-eighties plague of under-developed transitions that Arrow produced. If you notice, many of the rides Arrow built pre 1984 and post 1994 have had really no problems with transitions.
Thats all in thanks to the computer technology used during the 85-94 period.
Vortex does not feature any roughness. Period. It does however feature violent transitions and shaky carriages. (that infernal shuffle) The ride also tries to do too much in the space allowed for it.
I believe an updated set of new running gear and larger wheels would help with many of those issues as well as reprofiling a couple of spots: the transition between the 2nd screw and the boomerang, and the straightaway banking into the first verticle loop.
SHAGGY: Though the mega loopers look as if they "don't hold up well" its really due to the way the transitions are placed together, Unfortunatly, most of the Arrow "big boys" have that issue
APRIL SAID: "It is like having an ex boyfriend email all of my friends and telling them things I do not want them to know"".
What in the heck are you talking about???? Thats about the stupidest comparison I ever heard.
-----------------
"I'm just trying to find a decent melody...A song that I can sing in my own company."
- U2 - "Stuck in a Moment You Can't Get Out Of"
Second, I just love the way Vortex looks. It is a work of art, and it is one ride that I don't mind waiting for (although there is rarely a wait due to extremely high capacity) just because it gives me a chance to watch the trains traverse its course.
Finally, why oh why does everyone complain about 'rough' rides? Isn't the point of a coaster to feel out of control? If you insist on tame coasters then stick to the kiddie area. Particularly multiple loopers such as Vortex are supposed to throw you out of your seat. If you don't like it, fine, but that's how it's designed and I for one love it.
-----------------
Closed topic.