Glitch01, most of CCI's have wood structures (24 vs 10 steel).
Ah the debate of one company's product being better than the other...I won't get into that.
I don't know why CCI seems to get the approval of parks more so of late over GCI. Probably it is a money issue. You may think that CCI makes easier to maintain woodies (out and backs instead of twisters), which would be cheaper in the long run. It seems that isn't necessarily so.
The two woodies CCI built in New England are both wood structures and are excellent coasters of two different styles. Excalibur (Funtown, Saco, ME, 1995) is a twister and is a great ride thru the woods. Boulder Dash (Lake Compounce, Bristol, CT, 2000) is an out and back but it has intense laterals and one of the fastest turnarounds out there (not a helix). And they built it on a mountain, actually placed footers into rocks and boulders, and left trees all around! Not necessarily a cheap(er) way to go. Both of those coasters have much wood in their structures. And look at Shivering Timbers: how many forests were cut to build that thing?
Maybe it is a management style thing. I get the impression that CCI works very closely with the whims of the park, no matter the size and scale of the coaster being designed. Seems like their coasters are usually the ones being built as an extension of the existing topography.
*** This post was edited by MABrider on 6/18/2001. ***
*** This post was edited by MABrider on 6/18/2001. ***