I don't get the Beast either. The design is like your first Roller Coaster Tycoon ride where you can't figure out how to get the train back into the station, and you have to make another lift, or a really straight piece of track at the end cause you can't afford anymore hills. :)
Now, its even more weird because of the trim brakes that squeeze off the speed right when its starting to get crazy.
Methinks...The Beast...as bad as it has become...may have aged better than any wooden coaster from this era...
P.S. I'm pretty sure The Beast design was cost related...the ground-hugging had to cost a lot less than building something that long with a bunch of air...
*** Edited 6/19/2007 8:57:05 PM UTC by Jeffrey R Smith***
Timber Wolf is the only woodie I can think of that was built during that time and was regarded by many as the best woodie ever, but it's far from being *that ride* these days. Oh wait, Riverside Cyclone is another.
AV Matt
Long live the Big Bad Wolf
Frankly...the best lesson learned (should have been learned) from that era is that behemoth woodies are not the route to go. You have to wonder how long some of these will be around. Hercules has already bit it. Rattler would seem to be a prime candidate for future considerations…specifically if that park ever gets another small woodie.
Anyhow it is all opinion…but The Beast and its deteriorating status among the enthusiast community basically parallels most woodies from that era. I would argue The Beast is actually holding up better…but that is my opinion of course. Suffice to say…should other woodies from that era hit the chopping block, I’m guessing The Beast will get a stay much longer than most.
I’m actually amazed at how many “young ones” still hold a fond place for The Beast in their hearts. As far as I can tell…there are not too many old farts (like me) who rode this thing in pristine 4-bench condition. I would have thought the haters would have out-numbered us fanboys by a lot... but that does not seem to be the case.
My last dozen or so rides over the past decade have been a disheartening slap to memory lane. I too have suffered through some tough shuffling…or even worse…an apathetic drag through the woods with nary a g-force to be found. It baffles me that there are new school supporters of the ride. I can only guess the setting and night-time atmosphere has served to mask a lot of flaws.
With such a premium placed on real-estate and a decreased probability of appropriate terrain…The Beast will probably always be a “one-of-a-kind.” There are very few (any?) modern coaster rides that could not easily be cloned given appropriate motivation and resources. But The Beast would be a monumental challenge for anybody. I’m guessing this simple “originality factor” might get the coaster another 30 years.
*** Edited 6/19/2007 10:02:40 PM UTC by Jeffrey R Smith***
Jeffrey R Smith said:
I would have thought the haters would have out-numbered us fanboys by a lot... but that does not seem to be the case.
I think among enthusiasts at least that is the case. Otherwise the ride would rank a lot better on Mitch's poll. Maybe "haters" isn't the right word, I think there are a lot of people who don't hate the ride, but can just kinda take it or leave it.
dexter said:
I'm not attacking anyone (not directly anyways), not even my least favorite poster (of whom I never named).
Right, you've never named him. But you've brought him up three times in this thread alone. We get it. *** Edited 6/19/2007 10:44:16 PM UTC by matt.***
The hallmark of a bad coaster: you have to avoid certain rows in order to get a good ride.*** Edited 6/18/2007 3:53:48 AM UTC by Mamoosh***
I would say the hallmark of a bad coaster is not getting a good ride on any seat!
I like the Beast. Yes, this is still in my top 5 wooden coasters. Then again, I thought some of the wooden coasters that people almost worship such as Legend and Georgia Cyclone were horrible.
Just look at these pictures. I can't think of anything that looks this massive and secluded out in the woods.
http://www.rcdb.com/ig67.htm?picture=4
http://www.rcdb.com/ig67.htm?picture=1
How a ride with almost nothing but straight track and a few wide turns gained so much national attention for so long is genius.
I've only had one ride on it, and it made my elbow bleed after multiple hits on the side of the train , but I have to give it merit for being such a classic. Nothing is like the beast.
Jeffrey R Smith said:
I’m actually amazed at how many “young ones” still hold a fond place for The Beast in their hearts. As far as I can tell…there are not too many old farts (like me) who rode this thing in pristine 4-bench condition. I would have thought the haters would have out-numbered us fanboys by a lot... but that does not seem to be the case.*** Edited 6/19/2007 10:02:40 PM UTC by Jeffrey R Smith***
Im one of those"old farts" :)
I rode it in '79,it was much different back then.It was good but I was kinda disappointed with it.I like coasters with airtime and laterals,thats something this coaster isnt(maybe the helix a bit).This coaster is all about speed(back then).But I wont knock it,it is very unique.
Im just not a big Charlie Dinn fan.
J.W. Elliott
Let me just say, The ride experience is drastically different. The coaster track and speed are basically the same as it's been since July79 tho.
No Highbacks, No Brakes, No ratchets painted custom painted trains, Signage and theming. Like a couple other people on this video. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7289711399869627611 I remember it like it was yesterday. When I returned to the park in July 79 I WAS LIKE WHAT THE HELL? with all the brakes.
Chuck, who thought it was rougher than normal back in may but it varies
The brakes were always there, it was a matter of how they were set that day, week or year. The obnoxious PTC "upgrade" lapbars. The headrests. The seatbelt. Now seatbelts with the housing looking silly on the outside of the trains.
The the painting.
Brown.
ugh! well, I think that mighta been '89, but why?
It was rustic looking, natural in some places, and that pretty red stain in most others. There was some big deal "look we're giving the Beast a new coat of paint!" Marketing scam.
Same park that painted away the red white and blue of the racer and painted it black and white. And took out a hill for good measure!
All that aside, it still is a good ride. And relatively in better condition than most of the 1980's woodies.
The American Eagle had a mean ass reputation for a couple years as well, but it's long gone.
Beasts reputation is still there. It's ok, still good ride. Now Sonny, that was just plain dumb.
I was 7 years old and barely tall enough to ride, but since my ride on The Beastie (when I was 3) I wanted to ride EVERYTHING.
We went down the first drop into the tunnel. "That was fun/" I was thinking. Turned and went down the 2nd drop. "Weee!" I screamed as I popped out of my seat. "I can't wait to see what come next!"
But nothing else happened.... We got back to the station, and I didn't understand how this was the "Best Coaster ever!"
I was quite dissapointed. But I guess it still holds its share of love from others......
DantheCoasterman said:
The first time I rode the Beast......................I was 7 years old and barely tall enough to ride, but since my ride on The Beastie (when I was 3) I wanted to ride EVERYTHING.
We went down the first drop into the tunnel. "That was fun/" I was thinking. Turned and went down the 2nd drop. "Weee!" I screamed as I popped out of my seat. "I can't wait to see what come next!"
But nothing else happened.... We got back to the station, and I didn't understand how this was the "Best Coaster ever!"
I was quite dissapointed. But I guess it still holds its share of love from others......
I guess it was so boring you fell asleep after the second drop and missed the helix that even I admitt is one of the best elements and endings to any woodie.
Chuck
But if you happen to be feeling sorry for me ;), don't worry, I only left the park after that ride with a minor concusion.....
You must be logged in to post