Jim Fisher said:
It must have been suffering from a square wheel when you rode. I rode it about 25 times during the Discovery Channel shoot and it didn't seem any rougher overall than usual, though one wheel was a little off.
Maybe I got a bad wheel. Bumpy may be a little much, but it was sure rougher than I thought a Vekoma of it's young age should be. I can only imagine the stress the wheel assemblies have to go through when changing from regular position to flying. With those gaps, the whole assembly must be subjected to some big stress each cycle. I(Just like when the upstops slam on a SLC) I wonder why their new SLCs or the flyers don't have some type of spring loaded assembly like those nice Swiss folk use!
-----------------
- Peabody
-------------
----------
Any resemblance to living or
dead people is purely coincidental.
-------------
The roughest part of a B&M is having to get off.
I thought that T2 at SFKK was the first inverted coaster in 1992? Anyway, Boomerangs are great! But the first time you ride them, going backwards you bang the crap out of your neck!
Peabody said:
I can only imagine the stress the wheel assemblies have to go through when changing from regular position to flying. With those gaps, the whole assembly must be subjected to some big stress each cycle. I(Just like when the upstops slam on a SLC) I wonder why their new SLCs or the flyers don't have some type of spring loaded assembly like those nice Swiss folk use!
The wheel assemblies on the Flying Dutchmen are much more sophisticated than on previous Vekomas. There is a certain amount of springing accomplished through rubber bushings and also links that tend to guide and stabilize the wheels. The wheel assemblies are not designed with smaller upstop wheels. Instead the wheels are all the size of normal road wheels
You must be logged in to post