If I remember correctly though, this was another Togo ride that had really low capacity and also low ridership. I'm no expert on the park or the ride since I've only been there twice, but that's what I remember about the ride in 2002. I could see Great Adventure sacrificing this almighty "coaster count" to scrap this ride.
But hey, at least I got a credit :-P
~Rob Willi
I will not be sorry to see it go since I have sworn off riding it due to it almost giving me a concussion before. *** Edited 2/7/2005 7:51:43 PM UTC by dragonoffrost*** *** Edited 2/7/2005 7:52:21 PM UTC by dragonoffrost***
I WILL admit the Roll Dive thingy was pretty cool, but that is all the positive feedback I can give that heap of metal. Good Riddens.
I won't shed a tear... it was fun years ago but it hasn't aged well. I'm glad the park is getting rid of a lawn ornament and preparing for the future.
Rolling Thunder could be a good ride, it's just that SFGADv won't take care of it. Kind of sad.
Viper was one of the worst coasters I have ever been on, I came off with not just a headache, but a sore neck.
eightdotthree said:
A mouse at SFGadv, do you WANT to wait four hours for a mouse? I still want to see a dueling mouse.
There is a dueling mouse. Winjas at Phantasialand. And it's superb, one of the best coasters in the world IMHO *** Edited 2/7/2005 10:50:28 PM UTC by Martin Valt***
SFGAdv doesn't have a standup from B&M... In August while I was at Dorney I ran into a B&M ride tech, and I asked if GAdv was going to get any B&Ms relatively soon since they already have one of each of the major 5 except Standups, and his reply was a cryptic "You just answered your own question." So I'm not quite sure what he meant by that.
Haha no I'm not giving Patrick the finger
Tim...the ardent togo/vekoma defender:)
still trying to think of a good signature...
dannerman said:
a bit off topic, what would people think of a stand-up hydraulic launch? Think TTD/KK + Mantis/Iron Wolf
It wouldn't work cause people's legs would buckle when the trains take-off out of the station, and plus, there is no way the catch car would work with the current B&M stand-up triain/car design and setup. I hate when people throw out new concept suggestions without thinking it through first. Might as well should have suggested a stand-up giga-coaster with no bicyle seat and with an underwater splashdown lagoon with viewing tunnel at the end. Absurd. The end.
kRaXLeRidAh said:
It wouldn't work cause people's legs would buckle when the trains take-off out of the station...
But Riddler does 65 mph. How long does it take to go that fast? A few seconds to do the drop. So it's a launched stand-up that does 0 to 65 in 4 seconds - I don't see how the forces would be any greater than a coaster drop that does the minimal speed at the top of the lift to 65 on a drop.
...there is no way the catch car would work with the current B&M stand-up triain/car design and setup.
Keyword is 'current'. If someone would actually try this concept, of course they'd create a system that worked. Otherwise B&M would still be trying to figure out how to get stand-up cars on inverted track. ;)
It's really not such a far fetched possibilty in terms of being able to do it. It's a far fetched idea in terms of someone actually doing it.
You must be logged in to post