Agent Johnson said:
If this is the case, then there are lots of idiotic and lazy park owners who could have purchased a great ride.
There would have need to have been major modifcations to the ride if it was moved. It did not meet current building requirements for clearances along the track. Being that it was built under different requirements it was allowed to operate where it was. Had it been moved it would have needed to meet the current requirements.
Rest in peace, TC.
I'd say some people are slipping tsk,tsk,tsk-- and you know who you are. ;)
It's too bad about it as it was a the best coaster of it's time. Unfortunatly, it was a shell of it's former ('78-81) self.
RatherGoodBear said:
This thread's been open for three hours, and nobody's chimed in yet with the "It's a business-- it's all about making a profit-- what's all this with the coaster preservation" mantra?I'd say some people are slipping tsk,tsk,tsk-- and you know who you are.
But if it weren't true, then someone would've surely picked this ride up, right? :)
...
...
Good enough? I'm feeling too lazy to debate today.
A pile of wood is not worth putting back together as a coaster somewhere else.
Check Out My Awsome Photos!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/airromeo4ever/
Fun said:A pile of wood is not worth putting back together as a coaster somewhere else.
Wow...you must have never ridden the Phoenix!
On the bright side at least it wasn't the CI Cyclone that got scrapped as SF had originally intended to purchase that ride in 1975 but found it less expensive to clone it instead.
You must be logged in to post