I would imagine that it wouldn't be much worse than the original one. Frankly, I'm not sure what the requirements were, but I was able to get a great image/FPS with a P3 450 mHz.
I bet most of us have something around (if not better than) that. I know I've upgraded since then... :)
-----------------
http://eastcoaster.com
You'll most likely need more memory than that. 160MB is chicken-feed in memory sizes. And your old Pentium 200 is likely to become severely taxed with some of the larger RCT2 scenereos and parks. Remember, he's not just making for bigger parks with more peeps with stronger AI, but also adding more animations.
It's 2002, and entire new 2Ghz Pentium 4 PCs are selling for less than a thousand bucks, with monitor and CDROM burner. I think it's time for some of you to actually consider upgrading. Start saving!
It annoys me that developers think they don't need to write good code anymore just because Intel and AMD are continuously driving clock speeds up.
Look at console systems-- they have to last 5 years with no hardware improvements and the games and graphics still improve-- because the developers learn how to program. PC architecture doesn't sit still long enough for anyone to learn it.
I finally upgraded from my dinosaur 300MhZ 48MB ram computer to a Dell, P4 2.53Ghz 512MB of Ram about 2 months ago. Talk about a differance in speed.
RCT used to take at least a minute to load now it's instant. Even surfing the web sped up alot.
I love Dells service too. I had a problem with conflicting software where it would just lock up as soon as your desktop came on. I called there help line and was back up and running in about 10 minutes as the guy walked me thru it on the phone step by step. Then he sent me an email on what we did and what to do if the problem happens again.
-----------------
Knoebels visits in 2002. 6
You must be logged in to post