Either of these would be a good addition to SFEG. It has a small footprint and is not as expensive of a coaster compared to others.
It's not a hyper or a big woodie but would be a great addition to this park that for the most part SUCKS. I rode SUE last summer and it was a great ride. So here to dreaming of getting one of theses closer to home as I only get out to Ohio every 2 or 3 years.
CP LOVER IN Colorado
where coaster are FEW
and the FEW COASTERS are LAME
SUE and V2 are the same exact ride
They aren't the "same" ride, they are however clones.
-------------
www.geocities.com/coasting_ohio for Real/Defunct/mini coasters and parks for RCT
Yes I relize they are clones. Either one of them or another clone of the ride would be Fine
I hope SFEG does not get an impulse coaster. I'm tired of only having two full circuit coasters.
-------------
Colorado Avalanche: Stanley Cup Champions!
Actually, isnt the one at SFGAm, 185 ft, and Ohios 180?? I think they made the clone A lil bigger. :)
The difference in height is due to the height of the station off of the ground. At SFWoA, there is a 180 ft maximum height so the station is closer to the ground than at SFGAm.
-------------
"It's Deja Vu all over again." - Yogi Berra
I believe that a good choice for SFEG's next coaster would be an Intamin hypercoaster.
Not having ever been to SFEG, I'd have to say is wait, and eventually something really excellent will come. :)
-------------
------------------------
Mindbender...Can you hear the Riddler chuckling?
A hyper would be to much of a cost for SFEG the park does not bring in that much money. If they get a impulse they could take out sidewinder and put the impulse in its place. Better yet put the impulse somewhere else and keep sidewinder
*** This post was edited by YZ10 on 6/21/2001. ***
*** This post was edited by YZ10 on 6/21/2001. ***
