STEREOTYPING PARKS

This topic will get down to the point unlike the other topic I started about SF. We need to make our displeasure toward parks based on the individual park. Enough of the across the board hatred toward a company that owns parks. This type of displeasure on a company is not good for the industry. I say this because each company has their strong points and weak points.
CF strong point= Cedar Point
SF strong point= SFGAm, SFMM, SFGAdv
Paramount strong point= PKI

These picks are based on population attendance and popularity. Others can be a factor but its the GP reaction.

-------------
"SAVING THE WORLD BEFORE BEDTIME" Powerpuff girls

Amen! I can handle that, but then again, I don't bash parks or companies, I'm too busy having fun. There's so much more to an amusement park experience than comparing coasters and complaining about service. Sometimes my girlfriend and I just sit on the bench at Knott's or SFMM and just enjoy the sounds of the park. If I encounter something unpleasant, I don't go into rants about the entire chain, I deal with the situation at hand, and then I drop it. I love SF, CF, Disney and Busch. None are perfect, all provide me with excellent entertainment in their own way. They're not all the same, nor do I want them to be ;)
-------------
Thank you Disney, thank you...


*** This post was edited by Middleman on 1/30/2001. *** *** This post was edited by Middleman on 1/30/2001. ***

Just look at franchises in general say mcdonald's
you will not get the same service in every chain even though you are supposed too. By the way i like any park with coaster's in them.

-------------
Army rangers lead the way