Take a recent coaster which opened in the last few years to at least ninety percent or more rave reviews: Millennium Force, X, Shivering Timbers or take your pick. Does this effect your take on a ride, or can you separate hype and maintain realistic expectations? I notice alot of people using the words, "overrated" or "overhyped". But what constitutes this? And who's doing the overhyping, enthusiasts, the park or yourself? And when you *finally* get to ride a ride that's received all this attention, how do you feel the ride must perform to live up to what you've heard?
After all, it's not really the coaster's or park's fault that so many people like it, is it?
-----------------
2001:The downfall of Disney. The year they stopped asking the mouse for his opinion.
Kinda like Alicia Keyes' CD. After hearing Fallin AND hearing her sing live,' I *had* to BUY her CD (not d/l it from audiogalaxy). I was ready for it to be BOMB like that. but when I listened to it, it was just "aiight". not *bad* per se, but not what I thought it was going to be.
jeremy
--one of these kids is doing they're own thing...
-------------
Sept. 11th 2001, Slayer released God Hates Us All. The song "Disciple" uncannily describes the events of that day, as well as the anthrax letters that followed.
--Slayer: Thrash band, or the next Nostradamus?
The biggest problem comes from coaster snobs who have this precise criteria for what constitutes a good ride. "Good" is often confused with "different," and it seems to get worse as one's track record gets larger.
That's why I like Sean F... he doesn't seem to get that way even after hundreds of coasters.
-----------------
Jeff - Webmaster/Admin - CoasterBuzz.com, Sillynonsense.com
"As far as I can tell it doesn't matter who you are. If you can believe, there's something worth fighting for..." - Garbage, "Parade"
haux said:
I'm trying not to hype myself up for X, but that's pretty hard. I'm gonna ride it on Saturday for the first time and all the reviews I've read say it's simply amazing. I hope it isn't a let-down, but I don't expect it to be.
-----------------
My wishlist for the 2002 season includes 121 different coasters, 92 of which I have not ridden.
90% of the time I go into a coaster with no expectations or think it is not going to be that good. Most of the times that works and I am sometimes blown away by how good it was.
Now there have been two coasters that I have been a little let down due to the hype and they are ST and BD. ST latter in the day became the AIRTIME MONSTER that it was hyped to be but my early rides were kind of like not what I was expecting. I came to love ST after it was greased though. BD on the other hand never seemed to reach the potential I thought it had and therfore I reserve judgment till I ride it again.
Chuck, who was shocked by Legend, Cheetah, Villain (On my second visit), and several other coasters by just reserving my judgment until I actually rode them.
BTW. I still like just about every coaster I've ridden in one form or another.
-----------------
Charles Nungester
167 coasters asn hopes to be over 200 by the end of 2002
*** This post was edited by Mamoosh on 2/14/2002. ***
By the way, how do you punished a coaster? "You will not be open today!! No rides for you!!"
-------------
----------
????
*** This post was edited by skysox on 2/14/2002. ***
And please, BGT, stop referring to Gwazi as a dueling coaster until you start operating it as one...just relax the absurd loading procedures, and dueling can return. It improves the ride experience considerably, but BGT has a large "older" demographic that simply enjoys watching the ride(s). Their "experience" really suffers when the coaster doesn't duel...
-Nate
You must be logged in to post