SFAW New Ride Guess

Once a park has proved that the double spiraling impulses can run without problem for a full season, then I think you may see some interest in people buying them, but not before then.

-----------------
Fav Steel: Millenium Force Fav Wood: Viper

If an impulse will run reliably in consistantly 100 degree summers, one could feasibly displace Ultra Twister - but it's not happening for the 2003 season. UT rarely gets much of a line, but it's so slow loading and low-capacity that there's almost always a wait.

Batman's not really any rougher than Ultra Twister, and it's one of the more popular coasters in the park. They won't remove it unless they're really going to put in something new and big (also not happening for 03). Ride in the front to minimize headbanging, anyway.

Believe it or not, they took the enthusiasts view as a consideration whether or not to take Shockwave which was offered. When not even the coaster dorks sounded excited (even vehemently opposed), it gave them some pause.

Why is everybody under the impression that impulses are CHEAP? Affordable, yes, cheap, no, 8.5 million dollars is quite a hunk of change. People make them sound as if Little A-merrick-a could invest in one and it would do them wonders. I have a feeling that many parks do not want to invest 8.5 million dollars on a straight line coaster (I'm not saying it isn't great because it is.)

Anyway, from the sounds of the size of the plot of land they have to work with, and the comments on SFAW no longer being cheap, I'm not going to get everybody going crazy because I'm completely taking this right off the top of my head, possibly an intamin rocket coaster? I mean, it wouldn't have to be at the scale of Xcelerater to be a good ride.

Oh and btw, it is Texas, they have a long season, I don't think opening in June is a big deal.

-----------------
The below statement is true.
The above statement is false.


astrofreak said:The spot's a bit too small for a super invertigo, though that would be nice. Too nice...


Hey, I'll trade you our coaster that doesn't work in the cold for your coaster that doesn't work in the heat! ;-)

*Ducks,* as all the other Great America lovers throw whatever's at hand at him. "Hey, hey, it was a joke..."

I still think that if anything in the future goes in that spot, it has a good chance of being a Zamperla flyer, which was the original intent of my post. Lol
Lets see here....Zamperla vs. B&M ??? PUHLEASE....Thats like comparing Hersheys to Godiva. Admittedly, a Zamperla flyer would be something new that most Texans had never experienced but I am rather hoping for something a bit more extravagant. I mean if steel can be bent to fit over walkways and other rides, why cant a B&M flyer fit in that footprint ? Tornado was 3,600 feet long and twisted all underneath itself. If a B&M flyer is 900 feet less, is that not a feasable fit ?? The ride could easily extend around Viper and over the lil path leading towards Tidal Wave. I just think AW needs to wake up and beg the parent company for some $$ to put it back on the map. There is a reason my friends and I call it "The Island of Misfit Coasters"

-----------------

Hey, I like Hershey!

On a more serious note, I think you're forgetting the structural differences between B&M and Schwartskopf. The much wider and heavier B&M track requires much larger suports and somewhat larger turning radi. Also, B&M likes to put in a lot of angled supports (perhaps to counteract laterals? Rideman? Anyone?), which would prevent the coaster from using the outer edge of the space. A further point is that Thriller has a lot of "stacked," if you will, track: that is, track exactly above/below parralel track for extended periods of time. Again, B&M support style and track structure make this awkward. In conclusion, my home park has two of the more compact B&M's around (Batman: The Ride and Iron Wolf), and it doesn't look to me like either one of them could fit in Thriller's spot.

It was said by a person in the Amusement business that Zamperla can currently only sell 3 Volare's a year, and that currently (4 or 5 months ago) they had already sold two, only one park has announced theirs (Prater Park). I guess it's a possibility but I don't know if I'd count on it.

-----------------
The below statement is true.
The above statement is false.


NitroTX31 said:
UHCougar, is that like saying bad sex is better than no sex ? I have to disagree. AW could strongly benefit from dismantling Ultra Twister and putting a dbl spiraling impulse in that space. Its not as though the footprint wouldnt accommodate the ride, and lord knows compared to the other versions of coasters, an impulse is fairly inexpensive. If "NastyWorld" were to get a clue, they would do away with Batman and use that land for either a floorless or a flying coaster. Now before many of you denounce me and say, "There is already a floorless coaster in Texas", let remind you that there will soon be 2 in CA. Why shouldnt TX reap the benefits of cloning ?? Of course a B&M flyer would be preferable since its obvious Fiesta Texas didnt get the bid for it. In all honesty, I have lost my taste for AstroWorld.


No, what I was saying is that I would rather keep BTE and UT if corporate would not give us anything else to replace them. Sure, if they were to be replaced, then ship those bad boys to Jazzland, and bring on the Intamin Impulse and the B&M Flyer.


SFGAMDie HARD said:

Oh and btw, it is Texas, they have a long season, I don't think opening in June is a big deal.

-----------------
The below statement is true.
The above statement is false.



Yeah, but AW closes full time operations in mid-August. Also, with the holidays coming up, and TT not even all that close to being dismantled, it would be after New Years before a coaster would start being built. (Probably quite a while after New Year since track is not even showing up yet to my knowledge) It probably would not be up and running until late June at the earliest.

If it does turn out to be the Zamperla Volare, then the constructrion time is really not an issue. I watched the Volare at SFEG go up rather quickly. After the footers were poured, the coaster itself was up in less than a month. It is a small coaster, and constuction does not take long on it. Construction on The Flying Coaster did not start until Mid/Late March, and the coaster was open at the end of May. Just an answer to those of you who question the construction time for this type of coaster.

-----------------
"Standing in line to see the show tonight and there's a light on, heavy glow, by the way I tried to say I'd be there."-The Red Hot Chili Peppers

I really wouldn't mind a regular Invertigo w/ the Face-Off cars, but I doubt that is happening even though it would fit in the footprint. I'm guessing that it will be a nice flat and not a coaster though.
nasai's avatar

What happened to Shock/Wave?
--------------
www.tripowered.com

And if AW were to get a Volare (not in 2003 but sometime) I sure hope they wouldn't name it The Flying Coaster too, but maybe they will because they already have signs and logos (topic deja vu).
How about an EXTREM style wild mouse?
rollergator's avatar

nasai said:

What happened to Shock/Wave?

....and 'Moosh gets the title of Trouble Boy, eh? I'm not sure, but I've *heard* that it may be going to the back yard of a certain webmaster in the Lone Star State....any guesses?

*** This post was edited by rollergator on 12/4/2002. ***

Gator, that's the most brililiant display of idiocy I've seen in quite some time!

You know they will get what they deserve at SF Astroglide one way or another.

I can't believe we left this thread alone for so long.

-----------------
'I want to be a statistic. I want to be masochistic. I want to be a clone.' - Descendents 'Suburban Home'

rollergator's avatar
chris, I am the king of "brilliant displays of idiocy"....I'm like the fourth of July for the terminally silly....;)
Mamoosh's avatar

chris...'Gator...you guys are mental!

According to my sources, Six Flags is still going to place Shock/Wave at two parks. SFA is still a leading candidate for one of the installations and since the height of the coaster would be under 125' they don't need to get the county's approval for it. Other parks I've been told are in the running include two of the chain's non-branded parks: Wyandot Lake and Frontier City.

Still, don't look for Shock/Wave to be installed anywhere in 2003 as S&S/Arrow needs to engineer and manufacture new track to make both circuits complete.

Moosh

-----------------
Coaster & Amusement Park Christmas cards available here. NOW ACCEPTING PAYPAL! We ship Priority mail -- Order today and receive your cards in 3 business days!

Moosh...

To we have to sic the goons on you?

Goons....GOONS!

-----------------
--George H
---Superman the ride...coming to a SF park near you soon...

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums - ©2024, POP World Media, LLC
Loading...