SeaWorld Orlando temporarily converts simulator to Polar Express Experience

Neat, really nice idea.

Am I the only one who thought that movie was over-hyped and under-delivered? I saw it on TV again recently and I just don't get the love for that movie. It's very mediocre.

I still haven't gotten around to seeing it. It's been recycling on a handful of channels recently, and I haven't even put it in my tivo queue.

I love CG, trains, and glaciers and still have had no desire to see it.

I'm surprised you think so, Jeff, given the technology used to make it. It wasn't perfect, but it was pretty cool. I think it loses something on a small screen, though. The book is magnificent, because of its brilliantly colorful illustrations. I think the movie was meant to portray the same experience which is why it did so well in IMAX.

You know, The Gravity Group is in the credits as consultants.

Technology doesn't interest me that much in movies. I've seen great movies shot on DV and terrible movies with hundreds of effects shots.

I thought the Polar Express was a horrible and obnoxious film that completely bastardized a great book. Props to SeaWorld for doing something in the spirit of the season - I'm sure it fits in nicely - but the movie itself was ridiculously bad.

-Nate

It can be very challenging to expand a children's book into a full length feature film. See "James and the Giant Peach" and all the Dr. Seuss attempts.

The last few years, it seems there's been a heartfelt attempt to try and maintain the unique spirit and tone of these masterpieces. I think of the recent "Curious George" as an example. I would place Polar Express in this category.

Personally, I found it charming and delightful. It was refreshing after so much garbage being produced under the moniker of children's films. My daughter, who just turned six, just watched it for the first time last week and pronounced it, "timeless" (she's been exposed to a few too many movie trailers, I think...)

The only thing I find fault with the movie is the creepy eyes. They really tried to get close to realistic human faces and expressions, but the close-but-not-quite quality makes them look like zombie undead.

If you didn't see the IMAX 3-D version of Polar Express then you didn't see the movie and thus it explains why you didn't enjoy it. The 35mm release should not have occurred. It was a bastardized version of the film.

Personally I think that the movie is a great movie no matter how you watch it. Having said that, the IMAX 3D version of the film is hands down the best theater experience I have ever had, and I have been to see it several times there since it's initial release. I agree with others who have said that the IMAX version really is how this movie is meant to be seen. If you haven't seen it there, do so promptly.

Does seeing the film on IMAX make it any less obnoxious? I'm guessing no.

Horrible, horrible film.

-Nate

---

See "James and the Giant Peach

---

Oh dear God let's just NOT.

That was one of the few movies FKA CoastaBaby and I took turns napping on in the theater. Okay, fine--other than VF's IMAX 'Dolphin' movie this summer, where the attendant had to wake all three of us up after the screening.

But at least we were up late the night before! I digress.
James. Peach. NO.

Okay, I'm done.

-'Playa

Well Nate, to each's own. You're entitled to your opinion. I suspect you don't like Christmas movies in general. A lot of people don't, and usually I don't much either, but this one I thought was very good. A little long in places perhaps, but overall a very good film and deserving of a timeless Christmas classic stamp placed on it.

Nice to see it made into an attraction for the holidays. Good idea!

How does not liking the Polar Express film = not liking Christmas movies in general? That's a pretty asinine asumption. I don't dislike Christmas films, I dislike bad movies.

-Nate