That's my theory. YMMV, and I'm probably wrong. :)
Maybe Vekpma added the possibility to block the wheels in case of a seat malfunction? I don´t think this is very likely, but who would have thought that the seat locking device would/could fail.
This shines a new light on the "failsafe" brakes on the Tilt/Thrill lift.
I'm thinking there's a braking mechanism for the wheels/axles.
Almost like your car - when you want to stop, there aren't any brakes that jump up from the road and touch your car - you simply apply a brake that stops your wheels from turning as fast and you slow down.
Given that, in addition to the change in aerodynamics, and it's possible it would roll back and valley at the bottom of the loop.
Information-sharing in the industry, ESP. when it comes to mechanical/safety issues, is nothing short of *top-notch*. Even in the absence of federal oversight... ;)
If the Feds were involved, it would take a year for the *report of the incident* to get cleared for the other parks to see...LOL!
*** Edited 3/20/2007 3:39:31 PM UTC by rollergator***
Borg uses a mechanical system in the station to raise and lower the trains, and locking pins that hold them in the "Fly" position. Firehawk and Batwing have the onboard system.
Needless to say, I don't see a Dutchman running anytime soon.
Something tells me Borg is going to end up with both trains completely taken apart and rebuilt again before it starts up again.
I can has signature?
Great Lakes Brewery Patron...
-Mark
ASSUMING that ^this^ is true, the "human error" was in the design of the controls.
On a more positive note, I might get to PCar on Sunday now... :)
halltd said:
The restraint didn't fail - the seat tilt mechanism did.
Thank you. I hadn't heard about that.
I can has signature?
You must be logged in to post