Where were the petitions when most Six Flags parks got rid of solid customer service?
Honestly, it's just a mascot. My goodness, was he really that important to you? If so, that's a baaaaaad sign.
Sirloindude, who would hope and pray that SFGAm just used the "Save the Whizzer" campaign as a PR tool, and who really wouldn't be disappointed if the Shockwave was the one that stayed, and who says that the Texas Cyclone is the only threatened coaster I'd care about preserving. *** Edited 12/13/2005 5:37:45 PM UTC by sirloindude***
13 Boomerang, 9 SLC, and 8 B-TR clones
I'm just saying that I find it a bit...odd...that people feel that he can't be topped and that he absolutely must stay.
I just had a funny mental picture of the next ACE Preservation Con, where the Zippin' Pippin, Texas Cyclone, and Mr. Six are the main topics of discussion. "An SLC over a Cyclone? Everyone likes wooden coasters more than wild, looping coasters that are the hottest thing around at a small, developing park! And on that note, what was Snyder thinking with Mr. Six? Time to chain ourselves to the Mr. Six figure on Pandemonium!"
Legal Disclaimer: The last sentence in the quotes was not meant to make fun of anyone, but rather a generic, humorous satire of ride preservationists in general, who are still cool people. *** Edited 12/13/2005 6:33:19 PM UTC by sirloindude***
13 Boomerang, 9 SLC, and 8 B-TR clones
Because enthusiast opinions will trump a multi-million dollar CORPORATION from deciding what advertising tool best suits their needs.
The fact of the matter is that SF wants to appeal to families and discontinue this form of ads so that they can afford to do what they want to do, not what we want them to do. We are in no position to tell these companies what is the right move and what is not.. there are people getting paid a lot more money than any of us to determine that very idea.
Mr. Six was a good image for the chain at a time when they really needed a "brand identity". The cross-generational concept is something SFI really needed to impress upon the "target market" (i.e., adults with kids and money).
The problem (as I see it, anyway) is he came along at a time when SFI's poor public image made it undesirable for any park to be viewed as "part of THAT chain"...
As always, YMMV.
I'm all for the "saving" of a coaster, especially if it's an older wooden ride that we're talking about. Parks like The Great Escape, Knoebels, Belmont Park, Magic Springs and Lakemont have shown that the concept of saving a coaster is a viable alternative to spending tons of money on an unproven design and plays a big part in keeping a piece of amusement history alive for future generations. Not all "save the coaster" campaigns go anywhere but it's nice to see the interest is there.
But keeping Mr. Six alive? I dunno... not only do I hate the character but I don't think he/she is anything but a future footnote in the industry. It's not like Holidog or Shamu...
Me not going doesn't seem to keep other patrons away from that park at all.
When I was there last summer (for the first time in years lol), I really thought it would have been very cool to see Mr.Six. I looked all over for him. A Loony Tunes parade passed by and I looked and looked for Mr. Six. He was not there. That in itself added to his mystique.
He's not just any ol' actor who can simply plop on a costume and go outside to take pics with the kids. The Mr. Six character is only one actor/actress, and can't be cloned around the chain. I didn't realize that until my visit that day.
Great Lakes Brewery Patron...
-Mark
2006 - 2009 Cedar Fair Ride Operations
2009 - Walt Disney World Attractions.
You must be logged in to post