Posted
Planning officials in Santa Cruz will review a revised proposal for the boardwalk's double shot tower. The proposal has come under fire because planners say it's a hazard for migratory birds.
In a stunning representation of journalism, a staff writer for the Santa Cruz Sentinel found easily the most stupid quote in a CoasterBuzz news item from seven months ago to reprint in the article.
Read more from The Santa Cruz Sentinel.
Here is a great example of what is wrong with journalism today. This yahoo actually took a post off a website chat room and used it for a "real" news story.
That is lazy, ignorant, and pretty darn pathetic if you ask me.
The writer is a weenie.
And since when do migratory birds use heavily populated urban areas for their travel anyway? Most birds I know of don't like people, or loud noises, or sudden movements.... Sure, you'll have your house sparrows and starlings and pigeons and mourning doves like you do in any populated space, but does anyone honestly believe that migratory birds would be afftected?
What a lame-o excuse!
And a LOL to themer2 .. your tree-hugging comment gave me a visual of Coaster Buzzers hugging a double shot tower instead.
Tall towers are one of the biggest threats to bird migrations. It's not that they "don't see a giant tower and smack into it," but the tower blinks bright lights due to airspace laws, and that confuses the birds, because birds migrate using the stars. Or, if the lights are too bright, birds are "sucked into" the light. Seen moths get drawn to your porchlights? Same happens to birds with tower lights. Even if they don't smack into the tower, they continue to fly around it, and become exhausted until they cannot fly further, and die of exhaustion.
And though the birds aren't really using urban areas on the ground, they definitely are flying over them. Most bird migration is done at night, high above the cities. During migration, birds only reach the ground to feed, during the daytime.
I mean, I agree that the article was very badly written. And though I'm a birdwatcher, I am not an environmentalist at all. And I'd sure love a great new ride, especially at the Boardwalk. But despite that, the residents of Santa Cruz do have a valid argument.
http://www.towerkill.com/ is an okay site. Not the most in-depth, you can certainly find more scientific pages, but that's just an overview.
Everyone should agree with this
Cut trees, save birds
I read with interest the article concerning the Double Shot Boardwalk ride and the risk to migratory birds. Bravo ... this ride should never be built. But this protective step certainly does not go far enough. Potentially, tens of thousands of migratory birds are killed every year in our county due to eucalyptus and redwood tress that grow much too high. I suggest leveling these two species as an added safety precaution. Of course, the city should first conduct an exhaustive analysis of whether the remaining tree species are adequate to meet the housing needs of our local non-migratory bird residents. If not, we should encourage the planting of short-growth public tree housing as quickly as possible.
KARL SCHAFER-JUNGER
SANTA CRUZ
Wood - anything else is an imitation
-Escher
-CO
You must be logged in to post