Infamy said:
If a parking lot is asphalt, it needs to be repaved every year or every other year. The lines need to be repainted.If it's concrete, there will be cracking that needs to be repaired.
What if it's grass/dirt?
That's probably more expensive than repaving.
Perhaps dirt is the way to go...
;)
1) Not as much gas would be used by the trams
2) With the trams not having near as far to go, not only will it be less gas, but you might not need as many trams, also saving labor and maintence.
Just a thought
You have to consider the long term effects, not only short term (and 4 years is, I believe, short term).
Will this solve problems in the long-term? Will this clear up enough space to work on increasing customer satisfaction (e.g. park expansion)? Will this address customer concerns? Could this relieve, or will it add to, the burden on staff?
Beyond that, most parks already have adequate parking nearby that is already not being used for parking.
Plus, the other thing to consider. The parks that do have parking sturctures are those which operate year round and can amortize the investment versus year round income. For most parks, that just isn't possible.
Parking garages in general only make sense when 1. land is expensive and 2. automotive traffic is constant year round. Thus, cities tend to have parking garages while suburbs tend to have sprawling parking lots.
As for the traffic nightmares, when a garage is done right, it can work just as well as a regular parking lot when trying to move mass amounts of vehicles in and out. The only problem is, if a problem arises after the garage is built that no one thought of, it is kind of a permanent problem...
You must be logged in to post