J7G3 said:
Hmm... I specifically remember watching the Demon - Great America Gurnee - run it's course with 4 harnesses open all the way. Back in the early 80's when they had the original thinner black harnesses. It looked funny.
That could have easily happened by just restarting the lift. The failsafe mechanism only stops the lift when the train is initially dispatched with the restraints unlocked. The lift can just be restarted after.
Of the failsafe could have been removed. :)
-Nate
(Now before you crucify me, please note that I chose that word very carefully. Remember, the difference between ignorance and stupidity is that there is a cure for ignorance.)
Over on PointBuzz, there is an article which describes, based on the patent drawings, the mechanism that drives Top Thrill Dragster. Look for it here: http://www.pointbuzz.com/ttdtech.htm
The beginning of that article gives an introduction to hydraulics and to the concept of hydraulic accumulators, which is how the Dragster launch system works. The initial example, though, is an unpowered system using a hydraulic cylinder and a small accumulator. The example is the mechanism used for virtually all of Intamin's restraints (lap bars and shoulder bars), except that the restraint doubles the system.
Referring to the diagram on that page...
Normally, the spool valve (3) is preloaded by the spring (3a) and actuated by the solenoid (3b). But you can see that is the first point of failure. If the spring (3a) should fail, the valve could fail to return to its closed, unpowered state (as shown). Second, if anything should allow the check valve (2) to hold open, that would also allow the bar to fail. A respected ride engineer (not me!) has actually identified a potential failue scenario in which the diaphragm in the accumulator (4) fails, allowing its nitrogen precharge into the hydraulic lines, so that a nitrogen bubble could cause the check valve (2) to stick open or to chatter, allowing the bar to fail. It is unlikely to happen to a single system, and each seat typically has two separate systems, making such a failure even less likely. But that's a way it could happen.
There are only two rides I can think of where I have experienced a total restraint failure, and in both cases it was an all-mechanical single-locking-position lap bar. One was an all-mechanical PTC bar that failed to lock properly on a junior wood coaster, the other was an Arrow all-mechanical bar on an ancient Runaway Train. In both cases the bar wasn't latched completely to start with.
There are a couple of things you should keep in mind. First is that the release pedal, electrical connection or linkage on the bottom or side of the car is not the only way to release the restraint. There may be an internal mechanism that can bounce open or otherwise fail. Second, remember that just because a restraint pops open does not necessarily put you into mortal danger. Someone mentioned the Vekoma SLC and the fact that the shoulder bar can open quite a distance if the ratchet fails...consider this: the bar does not have to be snug tight to keep you contained within the ride. As long as the openings are closed enough to prevent an unintentional exit, you're still OK. Furthermore, most rides won't actually throw you even if the restraint fails completely. Some will, but most won't. And believe it or not, people who write standards for restraint performance are actually (finally!) beginning to take this fact into consideration.
Several people have suggested that I should add some mechanical details on restraint systems to my web site; I will keep that in mind this winter if I have some time to build some new content.
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
(who would have jumped in on this thread earlier, but was busy attending a conference which, among other things, was trying to establish restraint performance criteria for "family" rides...)
I like that. :)
I can vouch for your last point having worked at a park where, no names here, certain folks rode rides sans restraints. Oh, and there were no unintentional exits.
Still I look forward to any updates you might be willing to make to your site to shed some light on how these systems function as that's always been somewhat of a fascination of mine.
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
On the intamin inverts they're smart enough to have the belt mounted on the side with very little slack instead of the front so that in case of a restraint failure it won't open up anywhere near as much as the SLC restraints will.
You must be logged in to post