Paging Captiain Obvious, clean up on aisle 5. *** Edited 6/23/2004 4:13:07 AM UTC by ApolloAndy***
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
Read kpjb's post again. It answers every 'problem' you bring up. It's not confrontation, he's passing along the info everyone was wondering about.
I don't know crap about how and why KW does what they do and I never claimed to.
There's one person who's posted in this thread who knows WAY more than the rest of us combined.
Should I believe the guy who actually knows how these rides are run or the guy who's mad because he has to wait a little longer than he thinks he should?
The point is, I don't think Kennywood is good with ride capacity. That's it.
Fine. But when it was explained to you why this is and why it sometimes *seems* as if KW is making silly decisions, you refused to believe it - almost to the point of claiming you know better than KW.
Being as we all now understand why KW runs PR and T-bolt the way it does and we all understand that people can be (and at times are) annoyed by the lower capacity that is the result of having to run these coasters in such a way, I think we can avoid a lengthy, back and forth, "he said, she said" style arguement and subsequent closing of this thread. :)
If it makes you feel better the Jack Rabbit 99% of the time starts out with two trains;)
- R.A
It's impossible now, with the automated systems. I'm sure I could do it if there were no people involved to slow me down by loading and unloading, though! ;)
Hi
What does that mean? I know at least a dozen people who work at KW. I work at the Home Depot, I don't know everything about the Home Depot.
As for the Jack Rabbit 3 train op, I can vouch that for the last fifteen years they never did. There's not enough brake runs to hold three trains anyway.
Technically, you could still do it if you ran without the PLC. One loading, one unloading, and one on the circuit. Wouldn't be safe, but it could be done.
Hi
By the way, when were there three brakes in the station? Was this years ago? I'm sure it wasn't recently, I don't remember it. For the size of the station, I don't know if there would be enough room for three trains.
There was a brake where the magnets are now, and in the same place as the load and unload now. It was that way until we put the magnetic brake system in a few years back.
Hi
kpjb said:
I heard rumours of 3 train ops on both the Rabbit and T-Bolt many, many years ago. Frankly, it's hard to believe, especially with how short the circuit is on the Rabbit.It's impossible now, with the automated systems. I'm sure I could do it if there were no people involved to slow me down by loading and unloading, though!
I heard that Fred Weber was the one who used to run three trains on the T-bolt (without anybody riding.)
The line's never really long enough to justify that, though.
Hi
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
kpjb said:
PR has magnetic brakes. An empty train, even a half empty train, takes f-o-r-e-v-e-r to cross the transfer track and enter the station. Add this to a slow guest, or someone having trouble with their seatbelt, and the train going up the lift reaches the crest and stops 165 feet in the air.
Why does this happen? If the previous train clears the transfer brake, can't the train on the lift move into the "course" block, regardless of how long the loading train takes to load?
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
You must be logged in to post